Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - Why do you want to study the basic course of innovation and entrepreneurship in universities?
Why do you want to study the basic course of innovation and entrepreneurship in universities?
First, enhance college students' awareness of innovation and entrepreneurship, and create an overall atmosphere of innovation and entrepreneurship.

Pay attention to the cultivation of innovative and entrepreneurial consciousness, and promote entrepreneurial spirit to the height of creating wealth, contributing to society and realizing self-worth.

Second, make full use of social resources to provide services for college students' innovation and entrepreneurship, and attach importance to the construction of relevant teachers.

Judging from the current environment, except for a few pilot schools, there are many phenomena in college students' innovation and entrepreneurship in China, such as poor teacher environment, students who have ideas but suffer from lack of targeted scientific guidance, and lack of social stage for interpersonal relationships and business networks. An excellent teaching staff is the premise of cultivating college students with good entrepreneurial quality, and an excellent tutor team is the guarantee of cultivating innovative and entrepreneurial talents in colleges and universities.

Significance:

1, change the educational concept, deepen the educational reform, and reform the people-oriented talent training mode of traditional education. For a long time, traditional education in China has been based on knowledge education, ignoring students' subjectivity, initiative and creativity, and there is a widespread phenomenon of high scores and low abilities.

2. Make up for the deficiency of traditional education. Although we have realized that traditional education is biased towards knowledge, and the modern education reform we advocate also emphasizes students' quality, ability, innovation and practicality, our modern education reform still lacks systematicness.