No matter at school or in the society, composition is the most unfamiliar thing for everyone. According to the characteristics of writing proposition, composition can be divided into propositional composition and non-propositional composition. Do you know how to write a good composition? The following are nine essays on debate compiled by me for your reference only. Let's have a look.

Debate composition 1 With the bell ringing in class, the debate in our class is about to begin. The theme this time is whether it is beneficial to open books.

Now the audience is very quiet, and some students are discussing; Some students read the manuscript over and over again; Some students are preparing for the debate on the stage.

The debate began, and the four debaters for and against all walked on stage with confidence.

Ye Cheng of Zheng Fang 1 stepped forward, holding the manuscript in both hands, and began to prove to us that opening this book is beneficial. However, Liu Jiahao, the opposing partyNo. 1, immediately retorted with confidence: "What you said is very good, but we don't think it is necessarily conducive to opening the book ..." Chen Shuwei immediately stood up and refuted the other party. At that time, the audience was silent. I was anxious, thinking: Yu Chuye, quickly refute, we are going to lose, really! However, Yu Chuye went up to him slowly, looked at the manuscript and retorted positively.

One minute, two minutes, three minutes ... fifteen minutes, time is so ruthless.

At the climax, the eight debaters on the stage changed from calm refutation to a war of words, and the students under the stage were also talking about it. The most clear sentence I remember is Liu Jiahao's: "Now it's an open book, not happy." We gave Liu Jiahao applause without hesitation. I thought to myself: we will definitely win each other. Twenty minutes later, Mr. Wu came to the stage and announced that the ayes won. We are disappointed in our opponents.

It turned out that it was not the fault of the four debaters, but that our opponents collected too few celebrity stories and their own experiences.

I don't agree with the positive view. I think we need a white lie in life, because there is a kindness and beauty behind such a lie, which is an indispensable seasoning in life. A lie is really a lie. But white lies are indispensable to us. If there are no white lies, some people hide their family's illness, make their families feel better, and make their illness recover quickly. Besides, this time we also learned Hungry Horse and The Only Audience. Who can say that the professor and New Year are liars? Will they lie to others for their own sake? No, it's not! The beauty of this white lie is that this deception is white. It reflects not hypocrisy, but beauty and goodness. Aren't you moved by their lies? There are the following examples:

Some people get sick and don't work because their parents can't afford tuition. The son gave up the chance to go to college and cheated his family. I secretly got a job without telling my family. Only 200 yuan's salary barely meets her and her mother's life every month.

Mary's child was born without ears, so she was laughed at by her classmates. She has no friends and lives in loneliness and melancholy. The only way is to find the right ear and have an operation after hard work. When he wanted to repay the man, the operation was successful. His parents didn't tell her that he didn't know his ears were his mother's until his mother died.

How I wish I could see my son for the last time when his mother was terminally ill and dying. However, my son can't come back, he can't do a little filial piety for his old mother, and he is very sorry to take care of the mother who once broke his heart for his son. Mother told relatives before she left: after she left, she told her son that her condition was stable and she would be loyal to the country with peace of mind. Is such a lie an obstacle to honesty? Therefore, I insist that white lies not only do not hinder honesty, but also greatly enhance the friendship and feelings between people, which is indelible to social stability.

Debate essay 3 "Let's have a debate in this class, shall we?"

"good!" Everyone cheered loudly.

"So the theme of our debate is:' If the end of the world is coming in three months, would you choose to tell everyone or not?' Choose to tell the square and wear a red scarf; What I'm not telling you is, take off the red scarf opposite, and now it's official! "

As soon as the teacher's words fell, the whole class immediately fell into a pantomime, some picked red scarves and some wore red scarves. I choose to take off my red scarf. Look around, hey, most people have taken off their red scarves!

The debate began, and a debater, Wen, was sent to the square. Oh, Wen is a vicious hottie! She said confidently, "My opinion is that we should tell everyone, so that they can spend the last three months happily without leaving any regrets for themselves. Isn't that great? "

As soon as the voice fell, the whole class was boiling. Xu Jiabao, the opponent, immediately raised his hand and retorted: "Then tell everyone that if it causes panic and causes some accidents, it will make everyone unhappy in recent months?"

Just after Xu Jiabao finished speaking, I was thinking that when Xu Jiabao was right and Wen Linyan was right, I had an extra hand next to me. Oh, it's Liu. He stood up at once. Everyone in the class was quiet and listened to Liu: "Why don't we make more rockets and take everyone to another planet?" The whole class immediately whispered, and everyone discussed noisily:

"We have a population of more than one billion in China, plus the whole world, my God!"

"How many rockets will be built!"

"It takes a long time to build a rocket, and it can't be built in three months."

"Yes, you can't build a rocket in three months. How much more do you want to build? "

"That even if three months can make a rocket, but if it fails? What should I do? "

"..." In everyone's discussion, this plan is untenable and unrealistic.

The students expressed their opinions, and the scene of the war of words was very warm. Obviously, everyone doesn't realize that this seems to be beside the point.

Suddenly, Wen Linyan struck the table and stood up to refute: "In those three months, if you don't tell everyone, adults are still making money desperately; The child is still studying hard, is this good? " The students of the other side were unhappy.

"Yes, of course!"

"That adults don't work, those who open food stores are closed, then you can have a good life! No water, no food, no electricity. "

"..." Anyway, I can't get a word in. Everyone is in full swing, so I can only watch.

Yes, this view is not good either. Can you live happily for three months?

Finally, the students are fighting for each other. It doesn't matter which side wins now. Everyone has his own opinion, and each opinion is different. Everyone wants to get it off their chest. The classroom is full of sparks of thought.

Today, our class is very lively Why? So we are having a debate. Positive theme reading is more important than entertainment, and negative theme entertainment is more important than reading. You didn't expect us pupils to enter the hall and argue with each other! We were ready first, and then the host said, "The game has started." The pros and cons 1 argue endlessly about their own views. The pros and cons also express their opinions. At this time, the host announced the formal entry into the free debate. In the debate, the other side performed exceptionally well in the second debate. I don't think the "generals" and "activists" on this basketball court usually speak very neatly. I can't believe it's critical. It's really good. Speak in an orderly way. What I say is definitely not as good as him. Thought of here, I feel admiration in my heart. The most fierce is the war of words between the opposing side 2 and the positive side 1. Opposing Party 2 argued: "Han Han doesn't like reading, but he can write unique books. Isn't entertainment more important than reading? " Founder's 1 argument also refutes loudly: "Just because Han Han doesn't like reading doesn't mean he doesn't read. Can he write without studying? " At this time, the audience who support the affirmative are applauding the wonderful answer of the affirmative 1 debate. They continued to argue and brought out some great men, such as Li Siguang, Lu Ban and Edison. After a while, the teacher asked Zheng Fang to change the subject. The "war of words" is not so fierce. Unconsciously, time passed, and it was time for the judges to judge. The best debaters are two opposing debates and a positive 1 debate. The pros and cons won by 4: 2. I'm happy about that. Because I support the affirmative. After listening to my introduction, do you want to join our debate?

The composition of the debate must be very familiar with the first three minutes of Class 5, which is everyone's specialty. In the fifth grade, our class began to hold a debate three minutes before class.

The flow of the debate competition is: one group of two groups of debates, two groups of three groups of debates, three groups of four groups of debates, and so on. As an introverted child, I have hardly participated in the debate. Even if the team leader asks me to attend, I will find out why I don't go to the stage to debate. But I don't know what happened. I was fascinated. I especially want to take part in the debate in the seventh week. I think my draft debate is well prepared. I thought the group leader would choose me because I didn't take part in the debate. As a result, I never expected that he didn't choose me. Now I'm not looking for an excuse to escape, but looking for a reason for me to argue. Fortunately, I kowtowed to the group leader, otherwise there would be no debate. When I came on stage, my old habit reappeared-nervousness. Another thing is that a teacher came to attend the class that day, and I swallowed a mouthful of saliva nervously. Because of my special situation that day, the teacher changed to a group of four groups of debates. Our opponent is the Sun family with Liang. Liang's words were easy to deal with, but she was tied with her teacher in the debate. I'm arguing, and so is Li Kexin. At the beginning of Li Kexin's eloquent speech, my heart beat faster. After Li Kexin finished speaking, I began to express my opinion: "We insist that primary school students' good grades are learned by themselves. As the saying goes, the master leads the door and the practice is in the individual. Teachers can give us skills and techniques, but if we want to learn better, we still have to … "I made a play with my opinion and stumbled halfway. This is a completely neurotic ghost. I didn't care about winning or losing at the end of the debate. I have gained a lot.

Debate Composition 6 This morning, the teacher announced that there would be a debate in the afternoon. Everyone cheered excitedly, and everyone was full of energy. It seems to be another wonderful debate.

In the second class in the afternoon, the battalion chief Wang Jiaqi made a wonderful opening remarks and started a lip-to-lip confrontation. The topic of this debate is "Do primary school students want to watch more TV". Each side has four debaters. I am the affirmative, and I am the second debater. I think other debaters are very confident and confident. Look, we've sharpened our swords, and we're ready to fight it out in the Chu River and Han Dynasty.

The debate began. When we argued, Liu Zexin put forward our view that primary school students should watch more TV. According to the other side's discussion about Monk's character, I had anticipated his point of view in advance. Sure enough, his answer was similar to what I thought, so I answered as planned. However, the battlefield is changing rapidly, and I forgot about Wang Tianyang. As the saying goes, if you don't hit your face, you can't swear. But this guy never understood the rules of the game. He dragged me to defend him. He even talked nonsense and accused me of wearing glasses because I watched too much TV. Please don't take me as an example. This is not a debate, this is obviously a provocation. I don't believe it. "How do you know I wear eyes because I watch TV? Jumping to conclusions is a bit ignorant. Amblyopia, myopia, astigmatism and eye diseases are many. I wear glasses, which has nothing to do with TV. Besides, it is inconvenient to wear glasses. Hu Kai, the 100-meter flying man, wears glasses, but he is not a champion. Chen Panlong, a teenager who picked up a plane, wore glasses and flew at an altitude of 20,000 meters with plane wheels for an hour! What's wrong with wearing glasses? " I showed no weakness, and the other party was speechless for a while.

The first game was calm, but the second game brought the morale of the audience and defense friends to a climax.

Because of freedom of speech, everyone tries to speak. It's so noisy under the stage that eight defense friends are also anxious. They all stood up and spoke loudly and quickly, for fear that the other party could not hear them. Under the stage, some spectators stood up and expressed their views loudly. I think this is the climax, and this is the essence of debate! Look at each other's defense. Monk's unhurried mouth opens and closes, and the words flowing out hit the nail on the head. What a glib tongue. That little Zhou has a muscular mouth and talks endlessly, which makes sense. Our three debates and the other three debates are short-tempered. No matter whether the teacher is here or not, his mouth has been closed and he has never been gentle. Seeing the other side's statement, I have different opinions, so I can't control it. The scene is really on fire, and it feels really cool!

The game is over, but everyone is out of control. Wang Jiaqi shouted "The game is over", and everyone was still worried. In the whole game, we took the initiative. Although the other side is also desperate and bitter, it still lost to Sun Shan by 1 1.

What a thrilling and unique debate!

The essay 7 of the "Ding, Ding" debate began, and every student in Class Five (5) was sitting in his seat with excitement and joy. Because the first class this afternoon is the long-awaited "debate contest"

"The theme of today's debate is" Is it beneficial to open books? "First there will be a debate, two debates, three debates, four debates, then questions from the audience, and finally the wonderful ending of the debate." Teacher Ma, the head teacher, solemnly said, "Students, first choose four debaters for and against the debate. After the debate, we will also choose two best debaters." As soon as the voice fell, a fierce and tense debate began. The first debate, the second debate, the third debate and the fourth debate were Fang Hang, Jiang Tianbao, Jun Chen Yu and Chen Weiwei. The opposite is the same. They are Xie Yuxiang, Yang Tianyi, Ruan Yi and You Yixiu. At first, the debate was very regular, and we watched it with relish. Later, the first debate and the second debate were temporarily occupied, so we temporarily withdrew from the competition and replaced them with new players. But this move put the square in trouble and almost lost the game after several rounds. At this critical moment, Jiang Tianbao rushed into the classroom with tears in his eyes, which not only saved Fang, but also made our class burst into laughter. Then, the real war of words began. Fang Hang just finished, the other party's Xie Yuxiang immediately refuted, and the other party's Fang Hang was not discouraged. Then he said that opening a book has many advantages, but Xie Yuxiang is not to be outdone. He found out the shortcomings from the perspective of Fang Hang and continued to refute. In this way, the "battle" between them never stopped, which made the two debates three debates four debates, and also made them the protagonists, and the people behind them couldn't say a word! After the audience asked questions, the special debate was almost over, but in the end, the pros and cons were tied, all because of Fang Hang and Xie Yuxiang! However, their efforts were not in vain, because they became the only two "best debaters" in our debate.

Through this debate, I firmly believe that this will be the best memory in my life and a portrayal of the friendship of our class.

Debate essay 8 "Wow!" After a shout of excitement, the students argued noisily. Huh? What are you doing? Oh, then a wonderful debate is about to begin!

The themes of our debate are "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". Oda first spoke: "I think it is beneficial to open books, because reading can increase our knowledge and broaden our horizons, which is beneficial to us, so I think it is beneficial." Oda's remarks won warm applause from the students.

Xiaohong said confidently, "I don't think it is beneficial to open books." If you read those unhealthy books, it will harm us! " "

"However, we should not give up those good books in order not to read those unhealthy books! We must not' once bitten by a snake, twice shy'! " What Oda said made everyone admire.

Xiaoling said unconvinced, "but I didn't read those unhealthy books!" " "Xiaoling's words made everyone laugh.

"You argue irrationally. Now that this social science is so developed, we should open more books and learn more knowledge. Only when you grow up can you make a difference, make great contributions to the country and become the pillar of the motherland! Therefore, I think it is beneficial to open the book. " Petty bourgeoisie talks endlessly, but also does actions, winning thunderous applause from classmates.

Xiaohong said anxiously, "When we say that opening books is not necessarily beneficial, we don't mean that opening books is not beneficial, but it is not necessarily beneficial. There are not necessarily two possibilities. " Xiaohong's rebuttal made the debate more exciting and intense. The students scrambled to express their views. ...

A wonderful and fierce debate is over, but that scene still echoes in my mind all the time. There is an old saying: "Break thousands of books and take Wan Li Road." We should read good books and useful books, so as to really increase our knowledge and broaden our horizons!

Debate composition 9 This morning, our class held a debate.

The topic of our debate is: Is it beneficial to open books? The teacher divides our class into two parts, one is positive and thinks that "opening books is beneficial"; Some people think that "opening a book may not be beneficial." After the game is over, switch roles again.

At first, I was in the positive camp. I thought to myself, "Is it necessary to argue? It is certainly beneficial to open books. Every time I read a book, I can learn knowledge and have fun. How can reading be harmful? " However, the opponent suggested: "Some people will become nearsighted if they don't pay attention to their posture." What do we do? My brain works like a motor. I replied loudly, "Myopia is a posture problem, which has nothing to do with the content of the book. Can't you read in the right posture? "

Then, we became the opposite side again. How to explain that the turnover is not necessarily favorable? I frowned and thought distressfully. Oh, by the way, those books that promote yellow violence must be harmful! As soon as my argument was put forward, my relatives were speechless, and we won a great victory!

This is really a wonderful debate!

;