Very watery. I am a middle school student who has just finished the postgraduate exam. Here, I want to make a pertinent evaluation of the so-called teacher Zhao's information, which is really not so good. Zhao is just a social person, and the information he collates has no logical connection. It's hard to remember even after watching it many times, but he is good at bragging. In fact, he is just making money for graduate students. Also, many of his materials were copied and pasted by Baidu, and many of them were deleted by himself, resulting in fragmented materials. I always feel that many words in the middle are gone. Moreover, many things are patchwork, and deeper things are not talked about at all, just some superficial storylines and the like. After reading them, I will only leave a fragmentary impression in my mind. Like the story king, I can't tell the inner connection and connotation at all, because he is not a teacher, but a social figure. As for knowledge, if you don't touch it, don't understand it deeply, and don't internalize it into your own things, it will be difficult to use it flexibly in the exam. He always publicizes that he attaches great importance to examples, but in fact, examples are icing on the cake in the exam and it is impossible to give timely help. Following his advice will only get twice the result with half the effort. What matters is the logical connection between the main points in the book, and it is enough to prove the main points with examples. It is wrong to give him such an example. Also, he will tell you that he attaches great importance to Chinese and western literary theories, but his Chinese and western literary theories are all copied from the literature review materials of Wuhan University, and many things are exactly the same. He made many mistakes in class. I don't remember the details. I didn't read it after the exam. Anyway, I was disgusted with what he said. I was ashamed to brag about my teacher and make jokes at this level. But the mistakes in the book are exact. In the part of Chinese and western literary theory, the historical book Yao Dian is compiled as Hanshu. This is a common sense mistake. Shangshu Yaodian belongs to the pre-Qin period. How high standard do you expect from a person who can't even master this basic knowledge? ! There are other mistakes, but I don't remember them now. I bought his information and read it for a few days. I stopped reading it when I found many mistakes. It's been a little long now. But every word I say is true, believe it or not. In addition, in his art theory part, many knowledge-designated reference books do not exist, and they are basically copied from the fourth edition of Tong Qingbing's Literary Theory Course. If you are not sure, take notes on two reference books designated by Zhong Chuan, An Introduction to Art by Wang Hongjian and An Introduction to Art by Peng Jixiang, and then look at Tong Qingbing's A Course in Literary Theory. The effect of reading a book in this way is definitely better than reading his information directly, because after reading the book comprehensively, knowledge will be linked in your mind, which is logical and will be internalized into your own things. You recite the main points, and your theory will be fine. This is definitely better than reading his information directly and remembering it directly. But if you ask him Mr. Zhao, your information seems to be piecemeal and poorly organized. He will only say that you don't understand, and then let you sign up for his class and say that he will explain. Tell me, spend thousands of dollars to listen to that shit I don't know if it's right? This man's face is full of businessmen. I am not a nurse, this is a graduate student's mind. For some people who lack self-confidence, if they want to frame me as a child care or something, they must respect themselves. If you come out to mix, you must be responsible for the students who took the postgraduate entrance examination. Don't copy some ghost things from east to west to make money. Besides, do you really trust him that much? ! He's bragging, it's none of his business that you failed the exam anyway! Isn't it over when he gets the money? As for his advertisement on the title page, what a coincidence! Every year, the first place in the media is in their class. ! There is a limit to blowing, right! Also, even if someone admits that he really bought the information, how many people who read and lost his information admit it? There are so many people who read his information, and how many failed the exam? Don't always be fooled by his advertisements, it is true to rely on yourself!