It is wise to bring the quality of students (30%) and social donation income (5%) into the evaluation system.
But there is something wrong with the algorithm!
One,
First-class students, to achieve first-class results, not only rely on the platform of the school, but also rely on personal struggle. Schools should not be greedy for the advantages of students.
Let the second-rate students get first-class results, which is the place where the school is awesome.
So the quality of students should be counted to the denominator.
Influenced by historical reputation and advertisements, some schools attract high-quality students, resulting in mediocre students. Can such a school be considered good?
The management leaders of some schools are basically paddling, and the old teachers dominate the teaching seats and so on. The quality of graduates is acceptable mainly because of the quality of students themselves. It is wrong for such schools to fail to keep up with the students' level.
Therefore, when considering the level of scientific research and the whereabouts of graduates, we should take the quality of students as the denominator.
Second,
Students feel the deepest about the quality of a school.
How to get students to vote?
Because students are tied to the school and get on the same boat, students rarely belittle their alma mater in front of outsiders, and even if they suffer from yabakui, they will give five points of praise.
There is an indicator that can solve this pain point-graduate donation.
When it comes to money, people will say the truest voice.
Statistically speaking, if graduates appreciate your training, they will be willing to give money to thank you. If graduates feel disappointed, they will smile slightly on their faces and feel mmp in their hearts.