Taking Wuhan University of Science and Technology as an example, according to Article 51 of Wuhan University of Science and Technology's Measures for the Administration of Curriculum Assessment, students can apply for examination papers if they have any objections to the examination results after the results are announced. Students should fill in the "Wuhan University of Science and Technology Examination Paper Review Application Form" within the specified time. With the consent of the student's college and the approval of the initiating unit, the initiating unit will organize a special person to review it.

General grades are strictly reviewed, and the success rate of review is not high.

In principle, only the examination papers of last semester are allowed to be consulted, and the examination time is at the beginning of each semester. At other times, students are generally not allowed to apply for examination papers. The consultation results shall be notified to the students' college by the starting unit, and the students' college shall notify the students in time. If there are any mistakes, teachers should fill in the "Wuhan University of Science and Technology Student Score Correction Form" and report it to the Academic Affairs Office for correction after being examined and approved by the vice president of the Academy.

Results Audit content:

1, objective subjects are not checked in principle. (except those who take the exam but are absent from the score)

2. Subjective test scores are only reviewed for omissions, grading and accuracy of grading, disciplinary records or other abnormal situations. The test paper will not be re-evaluated.

3, survey and design of various professional and registered architect related subjects using the answer sheet after re-evaluation of qualified subjects, only accept re-evaluation personnel to apply for review.

4. Review the contents of the test paper, including: whether the relevant information of the candidates is accurate; Whether the grading and inspection are correct; Whether there are omissions or errors; Whether there is any record of violation of discipline or other abnormal conditions. The width of subjective question marking is not within the scope of audit and is not used as the basis for changing grades.

5, the provincial organization review subjects, by the provinces responsible for the evaluation results.