? Recently, China Renmin University, Nanjing University, Lanzhou University and many other universities withdrew from the international university rankings, which is really gratifying. It can be said that this is a clear stream in the current "ranking tide", which makes people sit up and take notice!
? First, well, let's get down to business. Let's talk about why these universities have dropped out of the world university rankings. ? Different universities have different opinions, whether it is "quitting the ranking" or "not participating in the selection" or "not providing materials", it is "I won't play with you" anyway. To put it mildly, as a university said, "I don't want to be kidnapped by foreign indicators again." To put it bluntly, this means: I will go my own way and will not accept the "blind command" of foreign baton.
? It can be seen that these universities quit the ranking and are no longer keen on the "ranking" of colleges and universities. The real reason is that they are no longer subject to people, bound by foreign rules and regulations, no longer believe that foreign monks can recite scriptures, and no longer kidnapped by foreign rules. On the contrary, it enhanced their sense of independence and strengthened their cultural self-confidence. In short, this is that they have awakened and strengthened their cultural self-confidence.
? Looking back, some people said angrily: It is an evil way to judge whether your university is a first-class university by the world university rankings. From this perspective, quitting this boring ranking is also to return to the right path after awakening, that is, to take a right path that suits you.
? According to public information, there are currently four influential world university ranking systems: one is Quacquarelli Symonds (QS)； for short); The second is Times Higher Education (The; Third, the ranking of American news world universities published by American News and World Report; Fourthly, academic ranking of world universities, published by Shanghai Soft Science Education Information Consulting Co., Ltd., has been questioned for its rationality and fairness due to frequent "data fights" and interest disputes among institutions. Moreover, for China universities and students, there is a phenomenon of "acclimatization". In addition, such rankings despise the humanities. For example, the National People's Congress has always been a top school in humanities and social sciences, but it ranks very low in various rankings. This is obviously unfair and unconvincing.
? Second, then, what will be the impact of these universities withdrawing from the rankings? ? At a shallow level, it will at least drive more universities out of the predicament, towards freshmen and out of a new world. From a deeper perspective, it will bring a new concept to universities:
? First, it will be more realistic and pragmatic, and it will pay more attention to connotation development, instead of shorting the superficial and nominal shell universities.
? Second, getting stronger and stronger, getting bigger and stronger, will translate into good health and no edema.
? The third is to be more innovative and innovative, and will focus on innovation and innovation, not to be a follower and not to engage in imitation shows, because first-class universities must have their own discourse system and innovation system.
? Fourth, we should be more particular, more different, pay more attention to the pursuit of uniqueness and characteristics, and establish universities with unique history, culture and style. Such a university is its own, not a copy of others.
? A stone stirs up a thousand waves, and China colleges and universities will take this opportunity to achieve a more updated transformation, thus moving towards universities with their own characteristics, and constantly moving towards a new realm in the process of constantly surpassing themselves, and never consuming themselves in the "leaderboard" and "imitation show" again.