First, the real problem analysis-smart phone
The first article, series stem, the negative impact of smart phones we are currently doing, gives us a good direction. What does the author say about the negative impact of smart phones? This is about smart phones, and what we discussed earlier is the bad influence. If there are any shortcomings, we will put forward suggestions for improvement. Band 4 and Band 6 are repetitive routines, which is the purpose of our study.
The second question, except that it is not so obvious, shows that it has advantages. How about our mobile phone technology? Third, some traditions are psychological. Do a vocabulary test, and it will definitely help you to do the problem. After all, it can help you understand the article and do the questions efficiently. If you don't understand, that's the anchor point. The next three problems will appear, even beyond the mobile phone. Let's discuss the connection between mobile phone and psychology. It asks about traditional psychological research methods, and then there will be a comparison between the old and the new. Who changed it? The most likely is a mobile phone.
The present tradition and the present are all mentioned repeatedly in the course, and past lives talks about the pros and cons of one thing and another.
Look at the answers we gave. The first question is about negative effects. This is not obvious, but it has caused some concern. Although it is not so obvious, it has actually attracted the attention of many people. Note that this is the topic explicitly mentioned in the third paragraph of our original text, that is, the details, which have hardly been rewritten. This keyword is called lessobvious, and we have already prompted you in the stem message. It is not obvious to think about it, because the stem information must be the correct information in the article. When we connect the stem, we only look at the stem, not at the options, and the options are also wrong. If an option is consistent with the trunk of the problem, it is hard to go wrong. This is the exam-taking rule hidden behind our exams and the problem-solving skills in the course.
The second question, in the face of less obvious advantages, is what kind of content to consider. Let's talk about some things about this problem. The main contradiction in the article must have impressed you when you took the exam. A concept was repeatedly mentioned. Human behavior is human behavior. What is the relationship between human behavior and psychology? This word can also give you the answer to this question. If you don't know this word, you don't need this method.
The third question, what about our traditional psychological research? We will know from later reading that we must use technology and mobile phones now. What about tradition? It depends on laboratory observations and participants' reports. Tradition depends on industry and participants' own labor, one is technology and the other is manual labor.
The fourth question, what kind of benefits will it bring to us personally for future psychological research? This question is a typical detail. There is a word pin stapler, which means to help you determine that it corresponds to the word identify in the article. This option tests your word synonymous substitution.
Fifth, at present, psychology pays more and more attention to the real situation. What is the real situation related to? Mobile phones, everyone uses smart phones, and everyone's mobile phones will have data. This is a living case, there is no need to lock a group of people in the laboratory.
There is a very obvious logical relationship between these series of problems. The logic of westerners is in the bones. Unlike China, China people are more dispersed. China people leave the world with poetry, while Westerners with mathematics. This is logic. These are all reflected in their words. In the article, the essence of reading is logic.
These things will be elaborated in the official account of WeChat, Tang Shuli. In the next week, on the one hand, we will sort out the key words in the postgraduate entrance examination. In the official WeChat account, we will also emphasize the logical relationship, which can help you skip the obstacles caused by many words.
Second, the real problem analysis-Duke University's research
Let's look at the second one. Each topic provides less information than the first article. What is the current research achievement of Duke University, and why is it considered effective? This question is very difficult. At a loss, it is difficult to find a position. We give students the best book in class. The details are subject to the main idea. Where are the details? They are all talking about Duke University's research, which shows that the answers to these two questions should be highly consistent.
The third question, about which we haven't made it clear. The whole article is about this research. It must be remembered that the process of the experiment itself is not important, but the result is important. When we read articles, we always say that there is not enough time. Pay attention to the original text of this article, there are many processes. How do I know this is a process? You can quickly scan a lot of data and you will know that this is not a conclusion.
One of the questions and the answer published on the internet is different from them and controversial.
The first question is also the core of the senior high school entrance examination, which is repeatedly emphasized in our article, and the predictor of children's academic success. Grasping the core and main contradiction, and not talking about academic achievements when comparing other options. After combing all the answers, this academic achievement reappeared.
The second question, how to ensure that these proofs are valid, is that the examinee of this question may not find the anchor point on the spot, and the anchor point of this question appears behind the third question, which is upside down.
The third question, what is the result of the study, and what have we learned from the findings of Duke's study? Pay attention to two words, one is academic, which has appeared before, and the other is suffering. Your academic performance may suffer and your attention may not be concentrated. At the beginning of the article, it is discussed that children's attention will affect their academic performance the day after tomorrow. These two words are repeatedly mentioned in our article. We are the only option that involves both of these contradictions.
There is also a word that is particularly prone to high-frequency options, may, and its tone is particularly mild.
In the penultimate question, I emphasize that repetition is the key point, the key point is the test center, and the details obey the main idea. Grasp these, and your academic performance will be better.
My answer to this last question is different from that on the Internet. The conclusion I give is that school education should adopt an all-round approach. School education needs to adopt an all-round approach. The second question on the Internet is consistent with Tang Shu's conclusion. How do you ensure that the current research is correct? We have given a lot of other possible variables, not a single study, there are many studies, you see, other studies are also very important. Together, it is called omnibearing, and various factors need to be considered. It is said that it is very important for us to pay attention to interpersonal relationships. Personally, I think it is biased, which is not the core of this article. The core of the discussion is that this is very important and that is also very important. There can be no contradiction analysis between the correct answer and the correct answer.