Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - An expert debater enters ~ ~ ~
An expert debater enters ~ ~ ~
Turn:

Loose management does more harm than good to college students.

Lin Huaqi

(against each other)

We think that loose management does more harm than good to college students.

Sticking to loose management is not equal to humanized management.

The universal idea of modern university management is humanized management. People-oriented is the requirement of management, and the all-round development of people is

Manage goals.

In our opinion, loose management is not a very humanized management method, nor can it achieve the goals of our university well.

Educational goals.

-reason: [humanized management] refers to the management that attaches importance to the existence of human nature as a person.

On the premise of respecting human nature, guide them, shape their behavior, manage them with habits and pay attention to people.

Creativity promotes development with innovation. Humanized management is not only limited to respecting human nature, but also emphasizes giving full play to people's role.

Subjective initiative, strive to exert management functions, promote people's all-round development on the track of human nature, and attach importance to stimulating people's creativity.

Force. We believe that loose management is easy to make people's freedom disappear, so that people do not abide by the basic rules of society, so

It leads to social behavior anomie and social order disorder, which is not conducive to building a harmonious society. -

The definition and feature of loose management is defect analysis.

The word "tube" in management means jurisdiction and supervisor, and it talks about the subordinate relationship and power and responsibility structure of posts.

Boundaries; The word "reason" in management means governance, handling and conditioning, that is, orderly, appropriate and effective.

The benefits are obvious.

The loose management we are debating now is a management mode with less control and more freedom, which can be used by both managers and people.

Managers consciously act according to their wishes at that time to achieve the goals of the organization. Its characteristic is in management.

In every link, the management plan is rather general, and the implementation of the specification is very arbitrary, which is not suitable for the managed person.

Effective control mainly depends on the full consciousness of trying to coordinate contradictions.

In our opinion, this management model is very unstable. On the other hand, this management model has not been fully developed.

Giving full play to management functions makes management in an inefficient state and wastes social resources.

Combined with actual demonstration

We believe that modern universities should provide college students with a lot of free development space and a better creative environment. I

Our Wuhan University is recognized by the world in this respect. However, what we need is not a loose management method, it

Not only can we not have more freedom and creative space, but it is also likely to destroy our original good order.

Campus atmosphere.

-Campus examples, such as

On the problem of teachers and students attending classes on time;

Teachers attend classes on time and students attend classes on time, which is a normal teaching order. Every teacher and student should strictly abide by it.

Only in this way can we ensure the teaching quality of our university and maintain a good learning atmosphere. If the teacher is in a loosely managed

Under the conditions, I didn't give the students lessons on time. I was very tired today and got up late. Sorry, I'm half an hour late.

Students study by themselves first! In this way, will our students feel comfortable? Will we still have a good enthusiasm for learning?

We all come to school with our parents' hard-earned money and deserve high-quality education services. On the other hand, we study.

Because of the loose management, students come to class when they are in a good mood, gossip at random in class and their mobile phones ring.

One by one. Can we college students still study in such an environment?

We need strong management! We need more humanized management to reduce the lazy factors in human nature.

The troubles brought by study and life.

Our management can be moderately flexible and respect the reasonable needs of people.

For example:

If you can't attend class due to insufficient facts, you can ask for leave under the premise of strict procedures.

The teacher must not be late for class for more than 5 minutes or 10 minutes, otherwise it will constitute a teaching accident.

Classroom discipline must be good. Under normal class order, teachers respect students' freedom and students respect them.

Pay attention to the teacher's hard work.

Any group or organization needs certain rules to maintain its internal good order. This is in our university

Small society is the same, there are many rules and procedures to be strictly observed, and only in this way can our university's educational mission and management ability be achieved.

The function can be well realized. Every school environment has its own rules of the game. Loud noises are not allowed in the library.

You can't be disheveled and you can't bring other books in. There must be no noise in the teaching area, which will not affect others' study. In the living area

Observe the normal work and rest time, and do not affect the normal rest of others. Abide by all kinds of complicated operating specifications in the laboratory.

From the administrator's management ...

Our study needs a good order, and our creation also needs to be carried out under certain norms. Strictly abide by tourism

The rules of drama will not affect the free creation of our college students, but it is an indispensable condition. ————

"three noes" of loose management

What is the mission of our university?

Universities have three missions: personnel training, scientific research and serving the society.

Talents need to be cultivated, the study of scientific theory is a kind of cultivation, and the cultivation of humanistic quality is also a kind of cultivation.

Self-cultivation, social role is also cultivated. Loose management is actively cultivating high-quality talents and shaping the independence of college students.

Personality and other aspects, it seems too "inaction."

The scientific research spirit is rigorous, and any carelessness is unacceptable, while loose management is just right.

It is easy for us college students to breed lax study and research habits, which is so "ineffective".

Most of our college students want to go out into the society and build the country in various social posts. Only those who pass the exam are eligible.

Only high-quality talents with college education can be competent for our college students' future social roles. For this kind of social expectation,

Loose management is too "powerless".

Attention! !

In the debate, we must firmly grasp the shortcomings of loose management, and find theories and examples to explain it is even more harmful! this

What is the theoretical violation and practical harm of this management method to the development of our college students?

The purpose of management is not to stifle the nature and freedom of college students, but to create a better learning environment. Try to refute it.

Fang imposed on us the crime of stifling the free development of students' nature and personality! ! We have our own better management concept.

Management method: see (broken)!

Rest and stand.

Conclusion: We insist that loose management has too many serious disadvantages. For us college students:

The disadvantages outweigh the advantages.

We think there is a better management method than loose management. That should be a more humane and gentle one.

Service-oriented management is not too loose but moderately strict, not service-oriented management. it

We should provide our college students with a better study and living environment and campus order, as well as more tolerant freedom.

Academic environment.

Judges and students:

Hello everyone!

Our view is that for college students, the advantages of open management outweigh the disadvantages.

In short, management is to make decisions and implement them. Management includes two modes: open management and closed management.

Management.

Open management means that in a relatively open environment, students realize self-management by participating in school management.

Reason.

First of all, open management In a relatively open environment, students may participate in school management.

This is not only conducive to the objectivity and authenticity of decision-making, but also conducive to students' awareness of participation and communication with schools.

Come to the society and lay a good foundation for communication with the society. And closed management, in a relatively closed environment, students do not.

May participate in management, decision-making can not be objective, and it is not conducive to the cultivation of students' participation consciousness.

Secondly, on the basis of students' participation and equal decision-making, students can implement open management more actively and effectively.

Fruit, at the same time realize that you are the master of management. In this way, the consciousness of self-management is gradually established and finally realized.

Now Students' abilities in all aspects are exercised and improved in this process. And closed management is unequal among decision makers.

On the basis, students can only passively accept it, and there is resistance and resistance in implementation. In this way, decisions cannot be executed at the same time.

One's own potential cannot be tapped and cultivated.

To sum up, we think that the advantages of open management outweigh the disadvantages for college students. Thank you.

Chairpersons, judges and other debaters:

Hello everyone! Our stated view is that for college students, the advantages of open management outweigh the disadvantages.

Open management is relative to closed management. Specifically, between universities and college students, it starts from the school.

Subjectively manage students, and at the same time announce the management process of the school to students, so that students can understand the school.

Workflow, in fact, is the principle that students carry out in their daily life, which is well known to some extent.

Technically speaking, it is to let students participate in the management process. In this process, the school manages and studies students.

Students' participation in management and implementation of various rules and regulations is actually the cooperation between schools and students. Revolutionary in the former Soviet Union

Linsky said: "people are soil, they contain the juice necessary for the development of all things;" Individuals are on this land.

Flowers and fruits. "The relationship between students and universities is actually like the people and the pioneers who lead the people's revolution. because

Schools manage students, so that is to say, students are soil, and they contain the juice necessary for the success of school management.

And the school is the flower and fruit of this soil. If there is no soil to nourish plants, how can there be?

A scene of a bumper harvest of flowers and fruits? Therefore, the main body involved in school management should be students, not just

Several leaders of the school. So, what kind of management can achieve student-centered management? There is no doubt that it is open management.

. Because in closed management, students are in a passive and controlled position, and any information of the school is only held in

The school ruler is in the hands of the school leaders. Students don't know anything about school work. How can they participate?

What about management? Moreover, in fact, closed management also provides many opportunities for schools to sneak around, which is helpful

In the corruption of public property and other unhealthy trends grow!

In addition, the open management of the school has also benefited college students. The advantage of doing this is everyone here.

Everyone including the chairman and the judges enjoyed it. Our school students' union, university students' union and various societies are actually.

It is a bridge between schools and students and the main way for students to participate in school management. Then dare you ask the chairman and everyone present?

Judges, who doesn't hold an important position in the student union or various societies? Are you deeply involved in the work of the student union?

Do you really feel close to the school? Do you have a sense of responsibility to be the protagonist of the school? Just take it.

As far as the recruitment activities of student union, school radio station and various societies are concerned, the minister is not serious about selecting candidates for the school.

Only? Therefore, I think everyone's answer is yes: it is true and true in the work of the student union and various social organizations.

I think I have a connection with the school. Did the Life Department exercise your organizational skills? Outreach department

Exercised your frustration and communication skills? This is what we get from participating in school management, which can benefit us for life.

The wealth of. And the reason why we can get such valuable wealth is because of the open management of the school! Therefore, I

Draw the conclusion that the advantages of open management outweigh the disadvantages.

Thank you, Madam President. Hello, judges and classmates.

First of all, we reiterate our view that the advantages of open management outweigh the disadvantages for college students.

Let me explain the word "openness" first. Openness is different from laissez-faire, and more different from indulgence. It refers to lifting the blockade.

Prohibition, restriction, etc. In other words, the so-called open management is not to let students let themselves go and run amok.

It is to give students a relatively relaxed environment so that their personalities can be released and displayed. In this sense,

Theoretically speaking, the advantages of open management for college students definitely outweigh the disadvantages.

Marx once said that the free development of everyone is the premise of the healthy development of the whole society. Therefore, it is open to students.

Open management is not only a problem of students' personal growth environment, but also the key to the future and destiny of the whole society and country.

.

The Ministry of Education has repeatedly emphasized the educational concept of "people-oriented, student-centered". What is "student-centered"

"? Is it "student-centered" to restrict students everywhere and stifle their personality development? No students?

Can we cultivate compound talents for the society by closing up and educating according to a model?

Secondly, about college students. First, college students are different from middle school students or primary school students. They are advanced, open and considerate.

You have to take care of yourself and arrange yourself. There is no need to be too strict. Second, college students are about to enter the society, in a complex circle.

Survive in the environment. Imagine if all college students were kept in a vacuum like flowers in a greenhouse, and the wind could not blow.

Yes, it can't rain. Then, four years later, when he leaves the greenhouse, how will he face the storm and lightning?

Listen to such a story. There is a boy studying in medical college, but he is not interested in medicine.

I was fascinated by the computer. Before it was opened, the headmaster of this school knew how to treat students.

Implement open management and give full play to students' potential. So he supported the boy from all aspects and made him take it seriously.

At that time, the IBM personal computer bought by retailers at a reduced price was modified and upgraded in the dormitory and sold to classmates. This kind of computer

It is very popular and all major companies have bought it. I started my own company at the age of 23,180,000 yuan.

Dollar fund. Ten years later, he created a myth similar to Bill Gates, with assets of $4.3 billion. He is.

Michael dell, President of Dell Company, USA.

Dell's success has created a myth in the computer world, and its root still stems from open management. Imagine if

Without the open management of the principal at that time, Dell might still be an ordinary doctor, but the computer industry has lost.

Masters and geniuses.

As the German educator karl jaspers said-the potential is always there, waiting for us to discover all the time, if

Without an open management model, all children's potential will be buried.

College students should have the ability of self-management, but now they don't. When will they have it? Work with

After that? Or when you get old? You know, when you are still relying on the closed management of teachers and parents, the people around you

People have long been able to analyze and solve problems independently. At this time, you are likely to be eliminated by society, when that kind of

When the so-called "closed management" that is "responsible for students" produces many socially outdated products, who will deny opening up?

What are the benefits of type management?

2 1 century What is the most expensive? Talent! Only by implementing open management can students get relatively free space to fill.

Only by practicing and exercising ourselves can we cultivate high-quality talents.

Every student has a black box full of flames hidden in his body. Only open management can find openness.

The key of this black box, let it release the greatest light of life, let this light illuminate the life path of every student.

Let China college students strut and walk in the forefront of the times with their excellent ability and first-class quality!

Therefore, it is an indisputable fact that the advantages of open management outweigh the disadvantages for college students.

The following is purely empirical for the reference of the first debater.

First of all, the most important thing is to make full preparations, not only for your own side, but also to find out the loopholes of the other side, especially the parts that the other side may attack you. Know yourself and yourself.

Secondly, you need to pay attention to the reading rules. Different places may be different. It is important that: 1, one party shall not speak continuously; 2. Don't interrupt each other; In a free debate, you should be brief, so that the time accumulated by the other party can be used up first, and then the other party can preempt you.

Thirdly, be calm during the debate, keep in mind the other party's views and look for loopholes; Keep in mind your own point of view and avoid the other party attacking only the weak parts; Be sure to take notes and remember what you want to say to prevent your thoughts from getting stuck; When you ask a question in the right direction, you can't remember the answer for a while. You can look at the materials first and think while watching.

Finally, in the comparative debate, we must state that we do not deny the other party's theme, but emphasize that our own theme is more important, and learn to find arguments from the other party's point of view to prove our point of view. Appropriate use of irony, irony, such as arguing irrationally, reversing black and white, chattering endlessly, glib, stealing concepts, avoiding the importance, talking in Kan Kan and so on.

Debate the solution:

E: 1, when demonstrating that part-time jobs do more harm than good to college students, you should pay attention to whether the pros and cons will only hurt you a little. You must first admit that you do not deny the benefits of part-time jobs, but the disadvantages outweigh the benefits; When the other party asks you, "won't college students catch bad social atmosphere or be cheated after graduation?" You should answer that college students are rich in professional knowledge after graduation and can go to work in regular companies or enterprises to reduce their negative factors. When the other party refutes you that "college students work to waste their study time" and points out the fact that most students don't study at school, you'd better point out what this means, which shows that college students have poor self-control ability and are more susceptible to adverse effects after going out.

2.a When demonstrating that the advantages of loose management outweigh the disadvantages for college students, we should also pay attention to two premises, otherwise it will easily fall into passivity. One is to admit that loose management has disadvantages, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages; Second, loose management is not a lack of management, but a focus, because the examples cited by the other party are often the result of no management. B When the other party shows all kinds of bad phenomena of college students under loose management, you should dig deep, which shows that loose management of college students is not suitable, and loose management should start from primary and secondary schools. Take American education as an example. American primary and secondary schools are loosely managed. Students can sit, walk and even listen to music at will in class. Schools cultivate students' interest. Why are there so many Nobel Prize winners in the United States and none in China for so many years? If the other party says that this is determined by the American humanistic environment, then he will come to an absurd conclusion that China cannot implement the slack management, so China will fall behind. C when debating, we must grasp the concept of loose management, and many problems will be solved. If the other party suggests that loose management is only beneficial to a few people and should protect the weak, you can ask how college students will adapt to the complex society without loose management. When the other party puts forward that the stronger the strong, the weaker the people are, which is not conducive to building a harmonious society, it can put forward the theory that loose management is conducive to building a harmonious society; When the other party asks whether serious areas are suitable for slack management, you can cite examples of market economy and macro-control.