At present, everything is still unclear, especially compulsory fees. Generally speaking, the operator charges will be bound to the calling card. Does everyone have to issue calling cards? Otherwise, it seems that we can't do hard business. The core of this transformation is to limit the number of connected devices. The cost is high, at least much higher than the old scheme. Old Unicom also limited the number of equipment, but the cost is only 10 a month? Telecom's old router scheme is to enjoy a 100M router in a dormitory, and the price should be 58 yuan for one month. Now the new scheme requires a person to be 59 to get 100M, 50M and100M. Are they publicity MB or Mbps? Is this bandwidth the upper limit of a single device, account or router? You need to bind the campus card package.
Put forward a minimum requirement: tariff.
What can be determined at present (telecom only) is that the dormitory no longer supports self-built routers, and one account can only be used by two devices. The tariff-bound calling card package should be 49% of the phone bill package. You can get 50M broadband by spending+10 yuan and 100M broadband by spending 20 yuan. If the network in the teaching area and campus building can still be used for free after the start of school, you can choose the scheme of carrying WiFi/ hotspot+flow card. When you need to download large files, the cost in the teaching area in Bai Piao is definitely lower. If the network of the teaching area and campus building also needs this one-person one-network account to be used, then it is the same as buying and selling. It makes no difference. If not handled, it means that you can't have a normal study and life. Later, because of the epidemic, all students had to pay for online classes at school.
Improvement and optimization, as the name implies, are progress. From the point of charge: from a dormitory in 59 yuan to a dormitory of 236 yuan per month, what is the improvement? From the service point of view: from the original dormitory router, not limited to the use of equipment, to limit two devices, what is optimization? From the perspective of procedural justice: did the previous decision widely solicit the opinions of the student groups? Are students informed in advance of the mid-term construction? Have you considered the phone bill burden of students in the later use?
From the perspective of project benefits, isn't it the principle that whoever benefits pays the bill? Subversion of the original broadband model, students bear the brunt of infringement, will one party provide compensation? Optimize the network according to the spirit of a document. Does the department issuing the document bear the cost of this optimization and tort compensation? In other words, if the university has done this project, the hardware and software of the university have been optimized and the informationization of the school has been improved, then will the university pay the bill? In short, students can't pay the bill!
According to my experience in school for several years, the soft power of the school is not very concerned by students, and has become an important factor affecting the comprehensive strength of the university and restricting its development. Many students' demands for feedback can't be answered and solved. For example, summer dormitory electricity charges, living quarters rest time construction, canteen food hygiene, electric vehicle charging and so on. For students, the school is very careless, and what I said is to the point. As a student, no one wants his alma mater to get better and better, but the school itself hopes rather than expects students to work hard.
Later, people complained a lot, and there were voices and proposals to solve this problem at the principal luncheon, the student congress and the teacher congress. The school just couldn't hold on, and announced that routers could be installed in the same dormitory. It seems that I saw in the news on the school website that they used it as publicity to gain credit, but no one mentioned the issue of network security again. They were all students who loved Chinese teachers. I guess someone suddenly solved the campus network security problem that has been bothering everyone for a long time?
Later, when I went abroad to study for a PhD, I met a friend of politics and law in China, and often told him about all kinds of injustices in the school. He always said that this kind of thing could not happen in China politics and law, because from time to time, students in their school put the headmaster or the school in the dock, and the headmaster really didn't want to get a subpoena every day because of trivial matters. So, students of Duff Law School, you should study hard.
Fuzhou University has more than 50,000 undergraduates. Even if everyone chooses the lowest-priced 59 yuan 50M broadband package, the annual broadband expenditure will increase by more than 20 million yuan after the broadband transformation. However, the sharp increase in broadband spending has not significantly improved the user experience, and may even lead to a decline in the use of testing. Some students reported that only four broadband interfaces were reserved after the renovation of the six-person living area in Qishan Campus, which could not meet the normal use requirements. Therefore, students have a strong aversion to the renovation project.
It is worth noting that public information shows that the winning bidder of this project is Hengfeng Information Technology Co., Ltd., and Professor Chen Yuzhong of our school once served as a director of this company, but later left due to policy factors. Ms. Niu Yuzhen, the new independent director of our company, is a professor at the School of Computer and Big Data, and married Mr. Chen Yuzhong. Many students are strongly worried about the possible benefit transfer, and the school has not yet made a positive response to related issues.