Public education in China is relatively accurate on the issue of detention. This may be due to the long-term study of the exams by Chinese tutors, who have a deep understanding of the key points of the exam propositions and a good grasp of the exam rules. In addition, experts in every discipline of China civil servants have shown high professional ability, which enables China civil servants to make more accurate predictions when they are in custody.

The performance of Shanxiang education is relatively weak. Specifically, Shanxiang's tutor did not study the examination questions deeply enough, and his research ability was relatively weak. Although there are experts in Shanxiang, the number is small, and the grasp of the key points of the proposition is not as accurate as that of Zhonggong, which may make the accuracy of Shanxiang's bet slightly lower than that of Zhonggong.

Generally speaking, the accuracy of China's public trial detention may be slightly higher than that of Shanxiang, but Shanxiang also has advantages in detention.