The inference in the detail inference question needs to be closely related to the original text and should be moderate. You shouldn't play it at will, push it too far and too deep. Proposers often set some interference options for over-inference, and candidates should eliminate their interference.

Economic advantages often create cultural strength, and cultural strength radiates to economically backward areas with the help of economic advantages, which is a law of cultural communication. In this process, there will be problems of mud and sand, and some bad things will be learned.

According to this passage, you can know ().

A. the economic situation affects the direction of cultural communication. B. economic advantages and advanced culture.

C. economically backward areas will choose goodness and decide the superstructure from the economic base.

This paper analyzes and expounds a law of cultural communication, that is, economic advantage-cultural strength-culture radiates to economically backward areas. Generally speaking, the economic situation affects the direction of cultural communication, so choosing A. Option B is an absolute statement, taken out of context and not selected; The information of option C was not mentioned in the original text, and it was made out of nothing, so it was not selected. It is worth noting that option D "the economic base determines the superstructure" is the viewpoint of Marxist political economy, and there is no doubt that its content itself is correct. However, the original text only introduces a law of cultural communication, and does not discuss the relationship between economic base and superstructure, so option D is over-inferred and not selected.

Candidates should always keep in mind the trap and try to avoid falling into the trap of the proposer in the process of preparing for the exam and reviewing the detailed inference questions, so as to easily do the detailed inference questions and laugh at the examination room.