The passing rate of self-taught thesis defense is still very high. The passing rate of self-taught undergraduate thesis defense is as high as 90%, and the rate of excellent thesis is about 5%.

To obtain a bachelor's degree (apply for a bachelor's degree from the self-taught examination), candidates from the self-taught examination need to pass the graduation thesis defense, and the results are excellent or good. There is generally no thesis defense in the junior college. The self-taught thesis defense procedure is the same as that of ordinary college graduates. After the candidate's thesis writing is completed, the examiner's school will arrange teachers from related disciplines to form a defense team to defend.

How to reply to the graduation thesis of self-taught examination

1. Candidates must submit their graduation thesis in triplicate half a month before the thesis defense meeting, together with the outline and draft, which will be reviewed and signed by the instructor. The main defense teacher of the defense Committee will draw up the questions to be asked on the basis of carefully studying the graduation thesis, and then hold a defense meeting.

2. At the defense meeting, let the candidates spend about 15 minutes to summarize the topic of the paper and the reasons for choosing this topic, and introduce the main arguments, arguments and writing experience of the paper in detail.

3. The main defense teacher asks questions. The main defense teacher usually asks three questions. After the teacher asks questions, some schools stipulate that students can prepare15 for 20 minutes and then answer them on the spot. It can be a dialogue or the presiding judge asks three questions at a time. After listening clearly and writing it down, candidates will answer them one by one in order. According to the specific situation of candidates' answers, the main defense teacher and other defense teachers can ask appropriate questions at any time.

How to grade the self-taught examination paper?

(1) Excellent

1. can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theories learned and the relevant knowledge of this major.

2. Be able to closely contact the actual work of this system, this department and this unit. The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, which has certain guiding significance for practical work.

3. The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.

4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed and sorted by scientific methods.

(2) Good

1. can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better use the knowledge related to this theory and specialty.

2. Being able to better connect with the actual work and correctly and comprehensively analyze the problems has certain reference function for guiding the actual work.

3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, and the expression ability is good.

4. The materials are rich, the data are basically reliable, and it can be well processed and sorted.

(3) Pass the exam

1. Be able to correctly understand the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, have no principled mistakes in theory, and basically master and apply the relevant knowledge learned in this major.

2. I can also connect with practical work, basically express my views, and have certain ability to analyze and solve problems. However, the analysis of the problem is superficial, or it can only list the phenomena, and the center is not prominent enough.

3. There are certain arguments, the main data are basically reliable, and the sentences are fairly smooth.

4. There are certain original materials, which have been processed and sorted out.

(4) failure.

Any of the following circumstances shall be deemed as unqualified.

1. Violates the relevant guidelines and policies of the Party and the State, or makes mistakes in principle in theory, and has a poor grasp of relevant professional knowledge.

2. The article has no focus, unclear level and chaotic logic.

3. The material is messy or the main data is distorted, and the processing is poor.

4. The main content basically copied the achievements of others.

(5) Any paper that plagiarizes the achievements of others or is written by others, once found and verified, will be disqualified from evaluation and defense.

If you have questions about the self-taught/adult-taught examination, don't know how to summarize the contents of the self-taught/adult-taught examination sites, and don't know the local policies for registering for the self-taught/adult-taught examination, click on the bottom to consult official website and get the review materials for free: /xl/