Is it possible that Mr. Yao played the blogger's eye? I think it is almost impossible, because Mr. Yao was not selected in the first year, and he had to sue after being selected for eight consecutive years. How much psychological pressure did she bear in this process? Moreover, in fact, Teacher Yao is not incompetent. In the first round, Mr. Yao got the second total score. As a result, after the judges voted, she was not selected, and others ranked even lower. This kind of thing will make anyone uncomfortable, not to mention it has been happening for eight years in a row. Therefore, I think it is completely understandable for Mr. Yao to do so. Teacher Yao's process of safeguarding rights is also very reasonable and legal. Teacher Yao first consulted relevant lawyers and made representations according to their requirements. As a result, people simply ignored her and did not reply after the complaint period. The lawyer said it was administrative inaction, so Mr. Yao sued the Education Bureau.
Look at the local education bureau. First of all, the teacher complained that the Education Bureau directly ignored solving the problem. Trying to get Mr. Yao to give up his rights protection by hitting a wall. However, after teacher Yao's lawsuit was exposed, an investigation team was set up overnight to respond to the matter. This practice is wrong in itself. If you are indifferent to the teacher's complaint, it is not the right way to deal with the problem by taking action immediately after the problem is exposed.
Now that this matter has been exposed on the Internet, I believe there will be specific investigation results after a while. At that time, we will know whether it is the teacher's reason or the education bureau's own reason that led to the repeated failure of teacher selection.