The method of "nonviolent communication" is suitable for use in life and work. But when reading this book, I am thinking about whether it is suitable for the Internet.

Used in the environment? My conclusion is pessimistic. In the current internet environment, non-violent communication is difficult to achieve, or the cost of implementation is relatively high.

Tall man.

Non-violent communication needs to express one's feelings and understand others' feelings.

Non-violent communication needs to establish contact with each other.

Nonviolent communication needs observation, not evaluation.

This means that if you want to get non-violent communication, you need to pay a certain "communication price" in the early stage of communication, and this price is your gap.

The path will be a little longer. What you need is "describing facts" and "expressing feelings", not "judging and evaluating".

The communication in life and work doesn't necessarily end after "describing the facts" and "expressing feelings". Everyone will get down to business and start to calm down.

Discuss practical problems peacefully. The communication on the internet is likely to be interrupted when "describing facts" and "expressing feelings".

stranger

It is usually difficult to patiently listen to another stranger's long speech. It is also difficult for a stranger to empathize with another stranger. This has nothing to do with our

This is related to education and society. As the author said in the book, few of us have experienced "education of love" and "expression of love".

It is always easy to judge and evaluate.

Many conversations on the internet ended after expressing their own judgments and evaluations.

We can express ourselves in a non-violent way in the internet environment, but the cost must be much higher than in real life.

Because on the internet, it is difficult for you to let others sit there and listen to what you say carefully and patiently.

I have 20 years of online experience and published more than 2 million words. Wojing

I have experienced large and small online public opinion events, and there are hundreds of thousands of comments on my articles or individuals under my articles. In a few years.

In the past, I tried to communicate with negative evaluators through nonviolent communication, but obviously, nonviolent communication was as early as

It's over when it starts. Although most of the comments I received were positive and less than 5% negative, I seldom comment now.

Make a reply.

Because of nonviolent communication, the communication cost is a bit high.