Corporal punishment is different. Corporal punishment will leave an educated person with a painful education. Maybe it's wrong, but corporal punishment, just like parents beating their children, is to let educated people remember this time and correct their mistakes, rather than tolerate them with warmth. This is not suitable for people who need corporal punishment.
Then, if love education is more effective than corporal punishment, why don't reform-through-labour institutions and detention centers use love education to deal with those bad guys?
Everyone has inertia and bad habits. At this point, it is useless to wake up by love alone. There is a saying that "to punish your body is to save your soul". Be careful not to deny that "love is effective", what you want to prove is the word "more".
When faced with a specific thing, there is no time for you to deal with it with the slow time of "love". Let the wrong person know what to do with "corporal punishment" first, and then educate him with "love" why to do it ... (In short, don't deny that love education is also effective, otherwise, it is hopeless for the other party to catch the handle)
Corporal punishment refers to moderate corporal punishment, not just corporal punishment. If you have more education in love, you will become spoiled. Of course, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Besides, "it hurts in the heart to hit the body", "it hurts to hit, and scolding is love", "A famous teacher makes a noble disciple, and strict father makes a dutiful son" ... Don't these all tell the benefits of proper corporal punishment?
For stubborn people, of course, only appropriate corporal punishment can be taken to punish him.
In some cases, moderate corporal punishment is very effective. Physical pain can make people remember more deeply. However, we believe that corporal punishment should be combined with the education of love. When you physically punish a person, you must let him know that your purpose is to educate him and the starting point is love, otherwise it will only make him rebel. And the most important thing about corporal punishment is not to hurt his self-esteem. Physical pain will make him more impressed by his mistakes. Maybe in the future he will be grateful to those who punish him.
And if you hurt your self-esteem, it is likely to bring unimaginable consequences. Don't use corporal punishment in public. Corporal punishment is necessary and effective, but after corporal punishment, it should be given a warm influence to achieve the purpose of education. In addition, compared with long-term torture and corporal punishment, a few hard days will be more effective. Moreover, the physical punishment that tortures people seems to be more likely to cause people's rebellious psychology. Grasp the degree and time of corporal punishment according to the personality and age of the person being punished. It's best not to make him cry because of pain, but because of emotion.
People's IQ and comprehension are different, so we should teach students in accordance with their aptitude. For people with high comprehension ability, the education of love may be effective; But for our children, most people still don't have high comprehension ability, so we can take moderate corporal punishment on our children, which is a more effective way than love education.
First of all, we should correctly understand what "corporal punishment" is. Does education still need corporal punishment? Is corporal punishment ineffective or beneficial in the process of education? Are we absolutely against corporal punishment?
It is true that we do not advocate corporal punishment of students in the process of education, because corporal punishment of students may damage their health to some extent. Seriously, this violates the juvenile protection law. However, does this require us to absolutely abandon corporal punishment? Is corporal punishment really useless? We should treat this problem fairly. When people realize the harm of corporal punishment, they should not turn a blind eye to its positive effects. I remember an education expert said, "Punishment is also a means of education". Obviously, corporal punishment is also a means of education.
In fact, education can't be done with one mouth. In some cases, the role of the mouth is negligible. For example, students have poor discipline in class and speak loudly. Despite repeated oral education by the teacher, he still goes his own way. If punishment measures including corporal punishment are not taken, the teaching process of teachers and the learning progress of students will be affected! At this time, corporal punishment is necessary.
In addition, according to the survey, the early formation of human awareness of obeying the law stems from the fear of punishment. Nowadays, students are spoiled, with poor judgment, unclear concept of right and wrong and poor persuasion effect. Taking certain education and punishment measures to manage students can make students "ignorant" but "know right from wrong", which is helpful to improve their self-control and self-cultivation.
Secondly, we advocate appropriate corporal punishment, rather than infringing on the rights of students. Quality education emphasizes that teachers and students are equal in personality, that students are the main body and teachers are the assistants, and that teachers should respect students' personality and not insult them. This is true, but it is not necessarily contradictory for teachers to respect students and punish them physically. When students can't cooperate with teachers well in the teaching process, or even stop or hinder teaching activities subjectively, they must be given corresponding punishments, including corporal punishment. Otherwise, it is an infringement on the rights of teachers and other students, even on the personality and dignity of teachers.
For example, if a student speaks loudly and insults the teacher in class, can't the teacher take some punishment measures against him? If so, teaching activities will be affected, the interests of all students will be damaged, and the dignity of teachers will be trampled on! Never protect the legitimate rights and interests of minors while harming the interests of others, and never protect the so-called legitimate rights and interests of students at the expense of teachers and other students!
To say the least, what if we don't punish the students? See what happens. Students are not afraid of teachers, and teachers have no dignity at all. Any language of the teacher, including the knowledge imparted, is not important to the students. A teacher is something that students can play with at will. In fact, in some schools, many students do whatever they want under the banner of safeguarding the rights and interests of minors. Teachers naturally feel chilling and have no intention of teaching. Without school discipline and class rules, the whole education is a mess!
In fact, although many parents criticize teachers for being wrong in punishing students, many of them have already punished or are punishing their children. Ask yourself, how many of our parents have never physically punished their children? As an ordinary person, who is not in a hurry? Who wouldn't punish their children more or less in a very excited situation? So, is that also a violation of children's rights? Many parents will definitely say that they were forced in a desperate situation. At that time, there was a feeling of "hating iron and not producing steel". Since you know how you feel when you punish your child, why don't you look inside yourself and understand how the teacher feels when he punishes his child?
In fact, corporal punishment of students mostly occurs when other educational methods are not feasible, and teachers are forced to do so. The teacher's intention is good, which is also a manifestation of his responsibility. Don't think that teachers like to punish students, let alone think that teachers treat students as punching bags. Although the existence of such low-quality teachers is not ruled out, it is certain that such teachers are rare. Teachers generally don't punish students maliciously, don't treat corporal punishment as emotional catharsis, and don't punish students for no reason. If the teacher is irresponsible, he can turn a blind eye. Who will suffer as a result?
We don't advocate corporal punishment, but "not advocating" doesn't mean absolutely opposing corporal punishment. As a way of education, appropriate corporal punishment can sometimes play a role. When the teacher's personality is insulted, when the legitimate rights and interests of teachers and other students are violated, and when some students behave recklessly, we can and must use corporal punishment to protect the smooth progress of teaching.