First, fear, unwillingness, unaccustomed, and inability to innovate.
Dare to innovate is highlighted in: dare not pursue breakthroughs, lack the courage to reform and innovate; Dare not highlight the key points, not enough courage to make a difference; I dare not analyze myself, nor have enough courage to deny myself. In the eyes of grassroots leading cadres who dare not innovate, political risks make them afraid to innovate. Wei Shengduo was dismissed and "double-regulated" for trying to directly elect the party secretary and mayor of the town, which still has great influence at the grassroots level; Social risks make them afraid to innovate, and reform and innovation means adjusting the interest pattern, which will inevitably bring social risks. The social risks borne by grassroots leading cadres are positively related to the degree of interest adjustment; Organizational risks make it afraid to innovate, and self-denial may bring adverse effects to its own organizational development.
Unwilling to innovate is manifested in: unwilling to compare horizontally, unwilling to see the strange; Unwilling to change the status quo, unwilling to innovate, unwilling to bottom up, unwilling to innovate independently. In the eyes of grassroots leading cadres who are unwilling to innovate, the risks brought by economic investment make them unwilling to innovate, innovation requires economic costs, and innovation of grassroots leading cadres brings high economic risks; Innovation may not guarantee the promotion of officials, but no innovation will certainly guarantee the promotion of officials. The past leadership system made grass-roots leading cadres not only afraid to innovate, but also unwilling to innovate; Innovation may lead to the loss of power, and failure to innovate will inevitably lead to the loss of power. Because the goal of institutional innovation is to reduce the power of grassroots leaders, grassroots leaders are unwilling to innovate by themselves and suppress the innovation of subordinates.
Unfamiliar with innovation is manifested in the following aspects: unaccustomed to innovation, hot and cold; Not used to innovation, anticlimactic; Not used to supporting innovation, constantly changing. In the eyes of grassroots leading cadres who are not used to innovation, the tradition of moderation makes them neither give in nor act; "learning and practicing" makes him pursue reform and guard against running; Promote social harmony and balance interests at the expense of hindering innovation.
The outstanding performance of not innovating is: copying, simply imitating and not innovating; Falsification and innovation; Subjective and arbitrary, divorced from the masses, the Chief Executive will be anti-innovative. Among the grassroots leading cadres who can't innovate, "insufficient study" and insufficient training are the reasons, and being too busy with work is an excuse.
Secondly, the relationship between innovation and risk is changing.
Micro-environment makes grassroots leading cadres afraid to innovate, institutional mechanisms make grassroots leading cadres unwilling to innovate, negative factors in traditional culture make grassroots leading cadres unaccustomed to innovation, and lack of training and learning makes grassroots leading cadres unable to innovate. On the surface, it seems to be all truth, but in fact it is only empirical analysis. This discussion itself is far from the spirit of innovation. Micro-environment, institutional mechanisms, cultural traditions, training and learning do have unfavorable objective conditions, but anyone can complain, that is, grassroots leading cadres are not qualified to complain, because it is not difficult to draw a conclusion that the objective conditions that restrict leading cadres' innovation and the key to their transformation are not others, but only grassroots leading cadres themselves. Micro-environment is the starting point of grassroots leading cadres' innovation, and institutional mechanism is the starting point of grassroots leading cadres' innovation. The transformation of traditional culture needs the guidance of grass-roots leading culture, and innovative education needs grass-roots leading cadres to take practice as a bridge.
Based on innovation and with innovative thinking, we will find that the relationship between innovation and risk is changing. From the safe landing of Lv Rizhou to the promotion of Wang Yang and Chou He, it reflects that political opportunities have replaced the political risks of innovation. From the incomprehension of the masses to the support of the masses, the innovation of grassroots leading cadres has changed from social risks to the recognition and respect of the whole society. The relationship between power gain and loss and innovation is changing. The Regulations of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone on Promoting Reform and Innovation shows that those who are not innovative can no longer be promoted, and the reform of socialist economic system and political system is creating a good home for innovation. Continue to emancipate the mind, seek truth from facts, promote scientific development and promote social harmony, which requires improving the ability of leading bodies and grassroots leading cadres to promote scientific development and social harmony; The new situation created by quality education and innovative training advocates and requires grassroots leading cadres to develop new habits to promote innovation.
Third, the countermeasures to improve the innovation ability of grassroots leading cadres
To improve the innovative ability of grassroots leading cadres, it is necessary to raise innovative consciousness and advocate innovative ideas. With the change of ideas and the change of the world, the all-round development of central reform and innovation needs grassroots innovation to be piloted, and a large number of outstanding talents have been precipitated at the grassroots level, which is the key to leading innovation. Instead of sitting on the road and talking about objective conditions, it is better to start from scratch, seize historical opportunities, change subjective concepts and practice innovation.
To improve the innovative ability of grassroots leading cadres, we need to be brave in innovative experiments and be good at innovative practice. Grassroots leading cadres should be knowledgeable and courageous. If you have different knowledge and courage, you will know everything. What you know will be common sense. There will be no foresight. If there are different understandings, it is easy to violate objective laws and lead to leadership crisis.
To improve the innovative ability of grassroots leading cadres, we need to learn the innovative thinking methods of leaders and break the mindset. Learn associative thinking and reverse thinking, make good use of divergent thinking and convergent thinking, stimulate subordinates' innovation with their own innovation, promote organizational innovation with independent innovation, and lead organizations onto the runway of innovation.
To improve the innovation ability of grassroots leading cadres, it is necessary to strengthen the innovation training of the party's cadre schools and enhance the innovation space. Through theoretical training, it is clear that it is blasphemy to follow the crowd while learning from Scientific Outlook on Development is a misunderstanding, and it is a passive and harmonious misunderstanding of a harmonious socialist society. Through the interactive experience of practice, we can expand the ontological, epistemological and methodological horizons of students' innovation and lay a good foundation for work innovation.
To improve the innovation ability of grassroots leading cadres, it is necessary to improve the innovation mechanism and prosper the innovation culture. Grass-roots leading cadres should carry out grass-roots system innovation experiments with their own innovative attitude; Establish an evaluation mechanism to encourage innovation and provide the necessary carrier for the prosperity of innovation culture; Actively absorb the innovative ideas of the people, make demonstrations to promote the transformation of cultural concepts in the whole society, and also accumulate experience for the reform of the national system.