10 years, although the number of school-age children in compulsory education in China increased by more than 30 million, many rural schools were forced to close because of insufficient students.
Since the number of school-age children in compulsory education has not decreased, why are there fewer and fewer rural schools? Is the decadence of rural education irresistible?
It is suggested that to revitalize rural education, we should start from three aspects:
1. All primary and secondary schools in China are built according to the same standards in software and hardware.
2. The salaries of all primary and secondary school teachers in China are subject to the same standards, and teachers in remote areas enjoy subsidies.
3. The status of primary and secondary school teachers is changed to educating civil servants, and compulsory mobility is implemented once every 3-7 years.
Are these suggestions feasible? Can it really revitalize rural education?
10 years, 27 primary schools disappeared every day.
According to the information on the website of the Ministry of Education:
In 20 10, there were 2,574 ordinary primary schools and 56,479 ordinary junior high schools in China.
20 19 ordinary primary school 160 148 ordinary junior high school.
During the period of 10, there were nearly 65,438+million primary schools and nearly 4,000 junior high schools in China, with an average of 100 primary schools disappearing every year and an average of 27 schools disappearing every day. In less than an hour, a primary school disappeared.
Most of these disappearing schools are rural schools.
The decadence of rural education is unstoppable, and it is getting worse and worse. The country has put forward the rural revitalization plan, and the revitalization of rural education is an important part of the rural revitalization plan, so it is urgent to revitalize rural education.
Are the three suggestions for revitalizing rural education feasible?
Are the three suggestions for revitalizing rural education feasible? The following analysis one by one.
1. All primary and secondary schools in China are built according to the same standards in software and hardware.
The country is already doing this, and it is doing well.
As early as two years ago, a total of 2,767 counties in China passed the national basic equilibrium certification, accounting for 95.32%.
At present, the hardware standards of urban and rural schools in the national compulsory education stage have been basically balanced. Rural schools also have standard teaching buildings, laboratories, sports fields and other hardware facilities.
As for the software balance, for schools, the biggest "software" is actually teachers, and the country is already in the process of implementation.
Promoting the rational flow of teachers in urban and rural areas through "school management by county" is to implement the "software" balance between urban and rural schools. However, in practice, the teacher's "county-run school" has become the "last elimination", excellent teachers have stayed in the original school, and unnecessary teachers have been "assigned to the frontier". This result is just the opposite, which will cause more imbalance between urban and rural education, which runs counter to the purpose of teachers' "running schools in counties".
The hardware of urban and rural schools is very balanced, but if you want to balance the software, you really need to consider the second and third suggestions.
2. The salaries of all primary and secondary school teachers in China should be subject to the same standards, and teachers in remote areas should enjoy subsidies.
The two schools are separated by a road, one belongs to the city and the other belongs to the county. Teachers with the same teaching experience and titles in two schools have a monthly salary difference of nearly 2000 yuan.
The real situation of teachers' salary
The post salary and salary scale of primary and secondary school teachers in China are unified, but the subsidies vary greatly from place to place.
The state has given rural teachers subsidies for rural life and rural work, which has slowed down the pace of rural teachers entering cities to some extent, but the overall trend of rural teachers moving to cities has not changed.
If all primary and secondary school teachers in China implement the same standards, it will certainly attract more outstanding talents to engage in education and attract outstanding teachers to take root in rural education.
3, primary and secondary school teachers to education civil servants, the implementation of compulsory flow, once every 3-7 years.
At present, the flow of teachers is one-way Excellent teachers from rural areas have been flowing to cities, while excellent teachers from urban schools rarely flow to rural schools. The loss of excellent teachers has a fatal impact on rural schools.
It is very necessary to change the status of primary and secondary school teachers to educating civil servants and then implement compulsory mobility every 3-7 years.
Write it at the end
The hardware construction of urban and rural schools is basically the same, and the school teachers are equally excellent. Which parent is willing to send their children to school in the city again?
Is it feasible to revitalize rural education? How do you estimate it from the proposal of "school software and hardware, salary standard and identity change"?