This corresponding subsidy is an "elastic" word, and there is no specific standard, or it can be considered that there is no unified standard. Guess there should be a corresponding reward mechanism, or we should adjust measures to local conditions, and the standards vary from place to place.

Besides, this after-school service is not the so-called advanced teaching or paid service. After all, if it is, it will conflict with the "double reduction policy." Teachers are subsidized by the government or schools to enrich students' extracurricular activities.

Include: 1. Answer questions for students. 2. Carry out extracurricular sports and other activities.

After-class tutoring is not only to teach teachers, but also to hire retired teachers to participate, which should be the welfare policy of teachers.

Benefits of after-school service As a parent, I personally agree with this kind of after-school service, especially after-school counseling. We also came from our school days. At that time, the teacher said that if you have any questions after class, you can ask me at any time. I believe many students with poor grades are afraid to ask. Subconsciously, I always feel that this is a welfare for top students. Moreover, what the teacher said is actually personal behavior. For example, some teachers say nothing.

Now it is clearly stipulated that the school will definitely implement it accordingly. In such an atmosphere, even students who are not good at learning have the courage to ask the teacher. This is good for both students and parents.

It is undoubtedly the most ideal if teachers can tailor-made counseling for each student and actively encourage students to ask questions.

In fact, many in-service or retired teachers will provide some off-campus training. Teachers want to live and earn more income, and retired teachers can go to training institutions to start a second career, which seems understandable.

The current policy does not allow it, but the state will not care about the life and death of teachers, so this policy can be seen as providing an income for in-service teachers and retired teachers in disguise, and the state still considers the problem comprehensively.

What do you think of this problem? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.