He said that involution is the screening function of education, which I think is very correct, because there are so many people in this world, and each child's living habits and thinking patterns are slightly different. Some children are just not suitable for learning, and some children are interested in learning, so each child is different. Through involution education, children who can adapt to this learning style can be screened out. The advantage of involution is that more children can study hard and play their true level, but the disadvantage is that they will.

In fact, I don't think the people trained by China's exam-oriented education are so flexible. If a person can only study, then he will step by step, thinking about how to find a good job after graduation, rather than the kind of entrepreneurial enthusiasm for innovation. I think the education in China has trained a good migrant worker who abides by professional ethics, not the kind of innovative talents, but China still needs a lot of innovative talents at present.

Of course, some students can actually achieve good academic results, but they are also lazy and don't want to study. Through the inner volume, they found that everyone was studying. After studying hard, they found that their original study was quite suitable for them. It is actually very good for them to find the right way as soon as possible, since it is suitable for them to study.

Of course, the disadvantage of involution is that many families force their children to learn from an early age, and may not find the bright spot in their children at all. Although some children have poor academic performance, they have excellent talents in other aspects. For these children, if they are allowed to study crazily during the budding period of interest points, it will hinder their interest development. They may be interested in this at first, and then they will stop thinking about these extracurricular things after being oppressed by their studies.