"China University Evaluation Group" belongs to the Scientific Research Institute of China Academy of Management Sciences. You may think that its organization should be authoritative, because it should be affiliated to the China Academy of Management Sciences, but it is not. It can be solemnly said that the Institute of Science of China Academy of Management Sciences is not a subordinate institution of China Academy of Management Sciences, and the two have nothing to do with each other. You can refer to the People's Daily report:
When the reporter checked this with the Chinese Academy of Management Sciences, a staff member of the institute told the reporter after consulting the information that there were no scientific research institutes in the institutes under the jurisdiction of the Chinese Academy of Management Sciences, and Wu Shulian was not on the list of the heads of all the institutes. Subsequently, Secretary-General Zhang Naijian of the Chinese Academy of Management Sciences affirmed on the phone that the Chinese Academy of Management Sciences is a public institution and has no research institutes. (People's Daily, May 6, 2009 1 1 Edition)
Wu Shulian defected to such an institution, and its publishing house will have a cover-up name. This is nothing but giving us an illusion. Among them, there may be his experience in Guangdong Institute of Management Science, that is, for the work of university ranking, a good institution name can greatly increase the credibility of the results.
Speaking of "China University Assessment Team", we will think of a research group of the Ministry of Education. Actually, it's not. Wu Shulian has given its organization such a cover-up name, which will only give us an illusion again and make us believe that his data are official.