Personally, I think it is not suitable. The premise is that the test results accurately reflect the facts. The test of MBTI is best to have a certain understanding of the test or get the guidance of the tester. If you personally like this job and just want to verify it, I think the test results are probably inaccurate.

The most suitable coach is ENFP. You see, on the contrary.

There are many introductions on the Internet. Let's talk about an example around us first. One of my subordinates is a typical ISTJ boy.

I assigned two tasks, one is to maintain the data input system, and the other is to write training copy.

The completion efficiency of the two assignments is completely different. The former has clear standards and needs strong execution and meticulousness. The latter requires a certain degree of creativity and autonomy, and the working standards are not so clear. As a result, the former has advanced rapidly and has strong autonomy, while the latter has been tossing for a long time, and the final result is still unsatisfactory.

1, I stands for opening to the outside world. Type I people can certainly do well in training when they are alone, but they often feel tired and need to be adjusted. E On the contrary, when you get along with people, you will be more radiant and energetic when charging.

This dimension is introverted and extroverted, and there is also a coordinate system problem. If you are in the sales team, you may be E, but you still feel me. ..

2.s stands for the angle of consideration. Partial s is more willing to start from the micro, partial n is more willing to start from the macro framework.

3.t is willing to judge objectively, and F tends to start with emotions, so trainers need to understand the subtle changes in emotional occasions.

4, the last code J, J code is planned, there is no flexibility, if it is not J but P, it may drag on, talk about unplanned content, and play. J's execution is very strong

To sum up:)

Helen, a career planner