The specific format is as follows:
1. Title: A concise title that does not overuse terminology and attracts readers is most suitable for your article, and the title should not be lengthy and complicated.
2. Abstract: It is the most important part of the paper to summarize the full text, make clear the innovation points of the research, and facilitate extensive reading. Therefore, it is very important to write a good summary.
3. Introduction: To explain the necessity and importance of research, we must explain the innovation of research.
4. Methods: What was done, how to get the experimental results and conclusions, and describe them clearly.
5. Results: Focusing on the research theme, it was described in a logical order, with clear levels and prominent points. The results are expressed in words, charts or photos. Do not quote literature, do not analyze and evaluate your own results. Clear indicators, accurate data, statistical processing of the original data, hypothesis testing should give statistics, P value and confidence interval. The order of experimental results is not in the order of obtaining data, but in the logical order of trying to explain the problem. Learn to use charts, tables and text descriptions reasonably. Dare to discard unnecessary data!
6. Discussion: We should proceed from the results, stick to the theme, take facts as the basis, reasonably analyze and affirm the arguments. Seeking truth from facts, analyzing objectively, not exaggerating, not showing off, not improving ourselves, and not belittling others. You can quote some viewpoints and conclusions from previous literature and make footnotes, but you can't apply them in whole paragraphs. Namely: ① Analyze and judge your own experimental results, evaluate sublimation, from perceptual knowledge to rational knowledge, reveal the relationship between various observation results, and highlight the innovation of research. ② The research trends of this topic at home and abroad can be summarized appropriately to set off the new, different and excellent points. (3) For some unexpected special phenomena in the experiment or investigation, the accidental results can be objectively explained in the discussion. (4) discuss the theoretical significance and the possibility of practical application of this study realistically to avoid exaggeration. Closely combine the results of this paper, highlight the new findings of this paper, highlight the key points, pay attention to logic, and compare the results of this paper with the latest literature.
7. References: reflect the starting point and depth of the work and the inheritance of scientific and technological research work, provide objective basis for reviewers, editors and readers to evaluate the value and level of the work, and facilitate the retrieval and search of relevant books and materials. There are no less than 25 articles for peer review and no less than 20 articles for manuscript; Other manuscripts are generally not less than 15. The narrative of a single reference should be as brief as possible. The total number of words in the cited documents shall not exceed 25% of the total number of words in the full text, and the number of words in a single document shall not exceed 10% of the total number of words in the full text.
Editors have professional knowledge, keep a keen eye on the research trends in their own fields, and know the authors and readers of periodicals like the back of their hands. They clearly know what kind of articles they want and what articles are acceptable, and they also know what readers are interested in this research field.
Over the years, editors have repeatedly reiterated several very clear requirements:
A paper, an idea: before you start writing, you should ask yourself what your paper really wants to express. You need to think clearly about the novelty of your research and how to promote the development of current disciplines. Go straight to the point: constantly revise the paper to ensure the content is concise. This is a very important point, but the author often ignores it. A seven-page introduction is usually unpopular with editors because editing time is very tight. Periodical papers are a very professional way of research and communication, which must be concise, effective and clear. Unlike a doctoral thesis or monograph or a book, it is a condensed research result. Therefore, the editors' advice is to actively modify the paper and constantly delete and refine it until you feel that there is nothing to delete and modify, and at the same time, it can clearly convey the essence of the research.