This leads to the one-sided pursuit of SCI papers by researchers. This imperfection is mainly manifested in not distinguishing the characteristics of different disciplines, and measuring mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy and geology with a ruler.
Ignoring the characteristics and development law of each subject, it is easy for any layman who can do simple addition to evaluate the level of any subject, because as long as 1 is added to the number of papers and 1 is added to the impact factor of each paper.
Countermeasures:
To sum up, although 10 years, Chinese scientists and technicians have published more and more papers at home and abroad, but there are few high-quality papers. Like most developing countries, there are many imitations and few innovation breakthroughs, especially in the field of basic research, and there are fewer original innovations. The state should vigorously increase the capital investment in basic research, knowing that the innovation of basic research is the source of all innovation.
Impetuous style of study and quick success are the enemies of scientific and technological innovation. When evaluating the academic level of units and individuals, the quality of papers should be given priority to, and quantity should not be valued. In particular, we should advocate the judgment of the intrinsic value of scientific and technological papers. Peer experts evaluate the innovation, scientificity and demonstration of the paper.
Above content reference: Baidu Encyclopedia-citation rate of papers