The reporter noted that in this incident, the biggest difference between Yoko Juchuan's statement and Fudan's statement actually lies in whether Yoko Juchuan signed a confidentiality agreement with Fudan.
A spokesperson for Fudan University told the reporter that after receiving the complaint from Yoko Kikukawa about the school, Fudan attached great importance to it and conducted a special investigation. The investigation concluded that no violation of confidentiality management was found. In this case, the confidentiality agreement procedure signed by the author of the paper is actually problematic. According to the relevant process, in order to obtain the classification, the paper needs the formal approval of the school or the superior security organization and enters the corresponding security procedures.
If students want to apply for the confidentiality of their papers, they must apply to the tutor for confidentiality at the beginning of the papers. Yoko Juchuan applied for confidentiality when submitting the paper to the library after the paper was completed. "There are strict regulations on the content suspected of confidentiality. Judging from this application form, Yoko Juchuan simply filled in the reasons for confidentiality as' company secrets' and checked' Top Secret Ten Years'. After seeing the application, the library did not see the confidentiality certificate of the school and thought it did not meet the specifications, so she did not approve her' confidential' application. " He said that the so-called agreement must be signed by both parties, and Yoko Kikukawa did not actually sign a confidentiality agreement with Fudan.
At the same time, Fudan also questioned the necessity of keeping Yoko Kikukawa's thesis confidential. It is reported that Yoko Juchuan's paper was published on June 65438+ 10/day, 2009, but according to online search, since September 2009, she has been interviewed by the media for more than ten times, covering the theme of her paper.