1. Learn to break down arguments. (1) parallel method. That is, the central argument is analyzed one by one, and several sub-arguments are decomposed to show the comprehensiveness of thinking. For example, plum blossom fragrance comes from bitterness, and cold can be decomposed into three sub-arguments: ① bitterness can stimulate enterprise; ② Bitterness can cultivate a strong will; (3) Suffering can cultivate creative spirit. ② Stratification method. That is to analyze things in depth to show the profundity of thinking. For example, "in the face of difficulties" can be broken down into several sub-arguments: ① We should admit difficulties, because they are everywhere and all the time; Don't be afraid of difficulties, because difficulties are like springs. When they are strong, they become weak. (3) Analyze and study the difficulties and try to overcome them. These three arguments are progressive. ③ Control method. That is, things are divided into positive and negative aspects to show the significance of thinking. For example, "learning more and asking more questions" can be decomposed into these two sub-arguments: ① asking more questions can be cross-quoted to solve doubts; (2) ignorance leads to academic neglect.

2. Grasp the structure of the discussion, so as to achieve structural integrity. The integrity of the structure requires consistent writing, clear organization and clear hierarchy. To do this, we must master the general structure of argumentative writing. The structure of argumentative essays generally includes total score, progressive, comparative and heuristic. Among them, inductive writing is a common structural way of composition in examination room. "Enlightenment" refers to consciousness, and "feeling" refers to feeling. * * * The same feature is that the materials are presented first and the feelings are behind. Feelings can be described first and then sent, or read and feel, such as literary criticism. This kind of writing generally consists of four steps: introduction, discussion, connection and conclusion. Of course, you can also take steps such as linking, introducing, discussing, summarizing or introducing, linking and discussing.

3. Typical and vivid arguments. Argument is the soul of argumentative writing, sub-argument is the skeleton supporting this soul, and argument is the flesh and blood of argumentative writing. Typical arguments refer to representative examples and famous sayings that can fully reflect the essence of things. First of all, ask for truth and be related to the topic. Secondly, we should abandon the old arguments and use new ones. Some students memorized several classic arguments in their compositions, such as Sima Qian, Madame Curie and Zhang Haidi, and used them from different angles as a kaleidoscope. In fact, even if these arguments are typical, they are not noticeable. On the contrary, it will be better to choose the new argument that "people have me without me, and people have me", which will make commentators feel fresh when reading. In addition, some students are used to reasoning with ancient examples, and the whole article fails to connect with reality, has no running water of the times, and cannot achieve the purpose of full reasoning. It is best to quote fashionable sentences and examples that the media generally pay attention to to to assist reasoning, strengthen the pertinence and sense of the times of reasoning, and make the article more convincing.

4. Handle the relationship between "things" and "reasons". In argumentative writing, both factual arguments and necessary theoretical arguments should be put forward. How to correctly handle the relationship between them is the key to the success or failure of article writing. As far as students' writing practice is concerned, many students often make the mistake of attaching importance to factual arguments and ignoring theoretical arguments, and the two are not organically combined. On the other hand, successful works always complement each other. In addition, when writing argumentative essays, we should also pay attention to the analysis of examples, and organically combine "matter" with "reason" instead of "replacing theory with pendulum".