Academic journals and conferences usually screen papers through peer review to ensure the quality and academic value of papers. These censorship processes help to reduce the possibility of quoting junk articles. In addition, researchers usually choose appropriate documents to quote according to their professional knowledge and experience to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the paper.
However, in some cases, researchers may inadvertently quote some junk articles. This may be because they are not aware of the problems with these articles, or they have encountered difficulties in searching and filtering documents. Of course, once problems are found, researchers usually revise and update their research results as soon as possible.
Generally speaking, most researchers will try to avoid quoting junk articles, but they can't completely rule out the possibility of misquoting. Academic circles will continue to improve the peer review process and literature screening methods to improve the quality and reliability of papers.