Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Capital contribution certificate of shareholders of design company
Capital contribution certificate of shareholders of design company
Certificate of contribution by shareholders of the design company.

For an enterprise or team, the importance of legal compliance lies in reducing legal risks, protecting the interests of shareholders and optimizing the talent structure. The purpose is to manage services, and the essence is to serve the core business of enterprises.

Actual case.

After in-depth research, the shareholders of the company "invented" a new business model in combination with the situation of their own industries (traditional industries, products belong to TOC)-renting products to customers at extremely low market prices, and once the lease expires, customers can choose to continue renting or buyout. At the same time, the client company launched different "packages" to attract customers to join the company and become "external shareholders". I have to admit that these shareholders are indeed industry veterans and have strong financing ability. As a result, a large amount of funds entered the company, the amount of funds far exceeded the expectations of shareholders, and the number of "external shareholders" far exceeded 50.

So much money went into the company account at once that the boss was at a loss. To put it bluntly, he didn't know how to spend the money, so he asked his lawyer for advice.

After communication, I designed a document for the company-"Contribution Certificate". They sent this document to "external shareholders" and set up a special fund account.

At that time, the super-large amount of financing gave the enterprise a shot in the arm. Then, the market fell sharply, and a few outside shareholders made trouble, claiming to report the case to the public security. The boss calmly took out this certificate and settled several troublemakers at a discount with his own funds. Imagine that several external shareholders consulted lawyers and judicial institutions with cooperation agreements and investment certificates, and the reply was "nothing is wrong, you can sue, but the company has no money and may not get the money." External shareholders thought that, after all, the boss was willing to "buy back" the shares, and the repurchase price was not too pit, and finally accepted it.