Specifically, it includes research history, research status (main academic viewpoints, previous research achievements, research level, research focus, existing problems and possible reasons, etc. ), new levels, new trends, new technologies and discoveries, development prospects and prospects. , and put forward their own thinking, comments and research ideas.
Literature review should pay attention to two points:
(1) read a lot of literature.
Before writing a summary, we must collect information comprehensively. If we can't systematically and comprehensively grasp the research status quo, or unilaterally understand other people's research results, and blindly think that a certain problem or field has not been studied, it will make our own research a repetitive work, or the brain hole is too big, and the feasibility of the paper is not high.
(2) Comprehensive analysis
Review can't just list the views of predecessors without systematic classification, induction and refinement.
If it is "comprehensive" rather than "narrative", then even if the content is systematic, it is only a statement of other people's views at best, and it cannot achieve the purpose of finding and establishing the theme of the paper through analysis and comment.
Academic continuing education classroom-focusing on academic improvement and empowering scientific research growth. xsjxkt