1, the topic is in line with the professional objectives and characteristics, and the topic is very targeted and practical. The structure of the article is reasonable, the level is clear, the relevant literature materials are closely related to the theme, and the reference materials are relatively new. In the process of writing, the author makes good use of professional knowledge for analysis, and in the process of argumentation, he mainly uses theoretical argumentation and factual argumentation. However, the shortcomings of the article lie in unclear sentence expression, insufficient argumentation and insufficient innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the graduation requirements.
2. The topic is contemporary and realistic. The structure of the full text is reasonable. The expression of views is basically accurate. The full text closely follows the requirements of the administrative management specialty and fully embodies the characteristics of the administrative management specialty. Check out more related information. But the main deficiency is that there are not many innovative things. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.
3. The topic of this paper meets the requirements of administrative management specialty and fully reflects the needs of social reality. The structure of the full text is reasonable and clear, and the viewpoint is correct, which can organically combine the professional knowledge of administrative management with the problems to be analyzed and demonstrated. The materials consulted in the writing process are not only sufficient but also closely combined with the theme. However, the format is not standardized and the case demonstration is not enough.
4. The paper has clear ideas and fluent sentences, which can well investigate the existing problems. The author's thesis is clear-headed, structured and logical. The viewpoint is expressed accurately. The research principles are appropriate. Combine professional principles with the topics to be studied in the process of argumentation.