What is an argument?
Argumentative essay is the author's views and opinions on the issues discussed, and it is the soul of an argumentative essay. Establishing arguments is the premise of writing argumentative essays. Arguments in argumentative papers must be clear, correct and distinct, that is, they must clearly express what is affirmative, what is negative, what is for and what is against, and they must have a clear attitude and clear views, and they must not be vague or ambiguous. Correct means that the viewpoint should conform to the objective reality. Standing the test of practice, distinctiveness and correctness are the basic requirements for beginners to write argumentative essays. If the requirements are higher, the arguments should be innovative, meaningful and practical. By innovation, I mean to have your own opinions, and don't always repeat others' opinions. The so-called deep meaning means that we can't just focus on superficial phenomena and talk about things, but reveal the essence and laws of things; The so-called practical significance means that the discussion should be targeted and put forward their own views on the problems that people are generally concerned about and need to solve in real life. We say that argument is the center of argumentative writing and plays the role of commander in chief. Without argument, it can't be an argumentative paper. But can only arguments be argumentative? No, there must be an argument.
What is an argument?
Argument is the basis of proving argument. In an argumentative essay, after putting forward an argument, you must also cite facts and tell the truth to prove the correctness of the argument. The fact that proves an argument is an argument. Facts as arguments include real cases, historical facts and statistical data. These facts must be true and cannot be fabricated or fabricated. Arguments based on false facts are untenable. In order to ensure the truth of the facts, the cited materials should have a source. Check it out, it's accurate and reliable As an argument, truth should be tested by practice and its correctness should be recognized by people. Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought are truths that have been tested and proved by revolutionary practice. They are very convincing and can be used as arguments. The principles, laws and formulas in natural science, as well as the speeches of some people with lofty ideals who have made contributions in history or real life, as well as proverbs and aphorisms spread around the world, can also be used as arguments as long as they are correct, reveal the essential laws of things and are full of profound philosophy. However, when quoting, we should be careful, and we should not take it out of context, far-fetched and distort the facts. At the same time, they should thoroughly understand the spiritual essence of relevant arguments and be complete and accurate. There are several basic requirements for choosing and using arguments to prove arguments: first, arguments must be tightly fastened and serve arguments. Achieve the unity of views and materials. If the establishment of arguments solves the problem of what to prove and the choice of arguments solves the problem of what to prove, then the process of argument will solve the problem of how to prove. This part of knowledge has two main points, one is to arrange the structure, and the other is to choose the argumentation method.
Structure is the skeleton of the article. Only when the structure is arranged can the article be complete and orderly. The structure of an argumentative paper generally includes three parts: introduction (asking questions), theory (analyzing problems) and conclusion (solving problems). Introduction is the beginning of the article, which is used to put forward the argument or point out the problems to be discussed in the article. Quot paper). This paper is the main body of the article, mainly using arguments to prove the argument. A conclusion is the end of an article, or a conclusion is drawn, or an argument is further emphasized, sometimes used to put forward hopes, demands or solutions to problems.
Let's talk about the argument method first. In the process of argumentation, it is very important to use the argumentation method properly. The argumentation methods we have learned in junior high school mainly include quotation, example, comparative argumentation and figurative argumentation. Citation is to cite rational arguments, and example is to demonstrate with factual arguments. When the two are combined, we call it. Quot put facts and make sense. This method is the most basic method for junior high school students to write argumentative essays. The main problems to be paid attention to in using this method are: it is not enough to just put facts and quote theories, and it must be analyzed. After citing facts or theoretical arguments, it is necessary to fully reason and explain the truth before the article is convincing. The method of comparative argument is to compare two opposite or different things. Through such a comparison, it must be correct, negative and convincing.
In a word, argument: the position or viewpoint you want to show;
Argument: your basis is facts or the truth known by people;
Argument: a way to prove your argument with arguments