1. What if I can't write my composition? 1. The bottom line for candidates to score argumentative writing is that the total score is correct, but many candidates stray from the topic, which lays a stumbling block for candidates to get the basic score of composition, such as 20 17 national examination questions: (5) refer to the given materials, take "water as the teacher" as the topic, and combine with practice writing.

(40 points) Requirements: (1) Clear and profound views; (2) refer to "given information", but don't stick to "given information"; (3) clear thinking and fluent language; (4) The total number of words 1000~ 1200. 20 17 national examination, most candidates digress. The reason is that candidates will ignore the topic, take water as the teacher, and pay attention to the content of urban development in the materials, and write about smart cities and urban modernization, resulting in unsatisfactory scores.

From this, it is concluded that if candidates want to write at least one "right" article in the exam, they must adhere to one principle: discuss around the theme of the topic, at least not divorced from the subject words of the topic. Second, candidates "can't write" will face another problem on the basis of correct writing, that is, they can't write and can't enrich themselves. In view of this universal problem, it is suggested that candidates can accumulate more and recite more hot spots. At the beginning, Chinese public education experts also provided some basic templates for candidates in case of emergency.

Template 1: Today. There are all kinds of voices about social mentality in society.

Some people say ...; Some people say ...; Others say that it is a peaceful solution to the problem of difficult medical treatment; I want to say ... Template 2: You don't see China now, ...; You don't see the society now, ...

So how can we solve the problem of ...? The key is ... ....

In short, as long as the candidates solve the two major problems of writing mistakes and not being able to write, there will be no problem in this part of writing. I hope that the majority of candidates can do no1with the help of Chinese public education.

I am not good at writing composition. How to write hello in the application? On-line preparation and counseling experts of Zhongzheng Shenlun will answer your questions wholeheartedly.

Writing an application has always been a headache for many people. It doesn't matter if the writing is bad. Practical writing is not an ordinary composition. First of all, you should know what to write in the composition, as long as you focus on the theme or topic given in the topic.

Then there is how to write the composition. The composition structure embodies three levels: summarizing problems, analyzing problems and solving problems. The first level is to summarize the problems in the opening, which can be explained by combining the problems or phenomena in the materials, and then put forward the general arguments on how to solve this problem. The second level is to analyze the problem, from this aspect, analyze why it should be solved, analyze the causes of the problem and the significance of solving the problem.

The third level is the demonstration of measures. Generally speaking, it is enough to mention three or four measures under the general point. Of course, it is necessary to further explain how to implement these measures. Finally, combined with some theoretical knowledge, deepen the theme of the article.

In addition, you need to practice more, and you can also go to some authoritative online preparation institutions with certification qualifications to evaluate and apply for correction, so that you can see your progress every day. Welcome to actively communicate with us in the learning process. The online marking system for the application of the Chinese government will be happy to accompany you on the road of your public examination until you are sent to the civil service.

I can't write an application. Hello, first of all, how much do you know about applications? 1, summarize the general situation, and use about 150-200 words to summarize the main contents/problems reflected by the data; 2, comprehensive analysis, with about 200-300 words, to express their views on the relevant issues in the material and briefly explain the reasons; 3, put forward countermeasures, with about 300-400 words, put forward countermeasures and suggestions for the problems reflected by the data; 4. Make a statement and write an argumentative essay of 1000- 1200 words in view of the proposed countermeasures and suggestions or the problems reflected in the given materials.

Secondly, from the perspective of the role of civil servants, this paper expounds the review method 1, role change; 2. Pay attention to hot spots, work reports, current affairs and politics, etc. 3. Memory materials, * * * speeches, famous sayings and aphorisms, etc. ; 4. Ways and means, scientific preparation, and follow the guidance of experts; 5. Write more and practice more, and write at least one article every week. Take the exam. Good luck in the exam.

4. How can I write a good application?

Emphasis: Before reading, you must have a "problem consciousness" and treat a lot of messy materials as a whole. Abstract problem consciousness: what are the manifestations, causes and countermeasures of specific facts? Specific problem consciousness: what are the requirements of the topic? Only by combining abstract problem consciousness with concrete problem consciousness can we achieve clear thinking and careful planning. Step 1 (Intensive Reading): Mark paragraphs and outline key words or sentences. 1. First and last sentence principle: Generally speaking, when writing an article, always pay attention to the transition from the beginning to the end. About 60% of the materials can find the general idea or central idea of the paragraph from the first sentence or the last sentence. This principle also needs attention in application writing. 2. Principle of related words: 3. Principle of common words: in the materials of the application examination, problems such as the performance, causes or solutions of events or problems are often involved. Therefore, the commonly used words related to this are also more frequent. As long as we seriously reflect and analyze the real questions over the years, we will find that the place where these words appear is the key place. Step 2: Summarize the general idea of the paragraph. This work does not need to waste too much time, and it needs to grasp the principles of integrity and relevance. Step 3: Classification is very important, don't underestimate it. According to the performance, causes and countermeasures of the problems, the materials should be divided into three categories.

5. What if I can't write my composition? I suggest preparing for the exam in the following four stages: in the first stage, you can use one week to do two sets of questions within the specified time, one is the national exam and the other is the joint exam.

It is suggested to do the examination questions of 20 18 and 20 19, and feel the types of application materials, how many parts of the examination paper are composed, how to set the questions, and what kind of thinking mode should be used to answer the questions. After these two sets of questions are finished, read the materials twice to three times or even four times. The second stage, the stage of applying for answering skills and knowledge learning, takes a week to review.

Mainly understand the characteristics of the proposition, marking rules, material combination, answering skills of each part, and matters needing attention in composition writing. Through this stage of study, you can increase your knowledge reserve and master answering skills.

The third stage, the set of questions training stage. Set of questions training generally requires 10 sets of questions, including national examination, joint examination and some provincial examination sets.

Through the training of test questions, we can apply the intuition and answering skills cultivated in the first and second stages. The fourth stage, the simulation consolidation stage.

One week before the exam, do two or three sets of questions in the mock examination room. Candidates should strictly control the time, and the problems found in the first set of questions can be made up in time when doing the second set.

6. What if I can't write my composition? I suggest that I should prepare for the exam in the following four stages:

In the first stage, you can use one week to do two sets of questions within the specified time, one is the national exam and the other is the joint exam. It is suggested to do the examination questions of 20 18 and 20 19, and feel the types of application materials, how many parts of the examination paper are composed, how to set the questions, and what kind of thinking mode should be used to answer the questions. After these two sets of questions are finished, read the materials twice to three times or even four times.

The second stage, the stage of applying for answering skills and knowledge learning, takes a week to review. Mainly understand the characteristics of the proposition, marking rules, material combination, answering skills of each part, and matters needing attention in composition writing. Through this stage of study, you can increase your knowledge reserve and master answering skills.

The third stage, the set of questions training stage. Set of questions training generally requires 10 sets of questions, including national examination, joint examination and some provincial examination sets. Through the training of test questions, we can apply the intuition and answering skills cultivated in the first and second stages.

The fourth stage, the simulation consolidation stage. One week before the exam, do two or three sets of questions in the mock examination room. Candidates should strictly control the time, and the problems found in the first set of questions can be made up in time when doing the second set.

7. I can't write a composition Can I improve my application in a short time? There is no shortcut. I just wrote an article on a topic every day for 45 days, and finally my application got 80. I also summarized some experiences and sent them to you. Please refer to. I also have a civil service examination group. It's inconvenient for you to be here. You can contact me if you want.

Reading materials generally have three or four topics, with a score ratio of 2:3:5 (here mainly refers to the provincial examination, which is flexible and sometimes selective. Some provincial exams only have two questions.

For the convenience of explanation, the following analysis is aimed at "2:3:5 structure"), and the answers should be considered comprehensively. Don't look at the materials first, look at the questions first, then read through all the materials and outline the key words.

It often covers the problems reflected in the materials, the reactions of all parties and the solutions. It is very important to rake and comb the materials comprehensively.

A comprehensive rake comb means that you should tick out the core words of each paragraph of the material. And then preliminarily concentrated.

A few words, pressure to a word; A word, down to a word or phrase. Then arrange them vertically and number them.

This has two advantages. First of all, you can have an overall grasp of the materials at a glance. After you read it twice, the whole material will be in your mind. You don't have to look for it on paper again and again when you do the problem, which wastes time, is easy to get confused, and is inefficient and ineffective. Second, you immediately have an intuitive and generally organized grasp of the problems reflected in the materials and the countermeasures given in the materials. There are six problems, ten countermeasures … and so on. In fact, after this step is completed, you already have a framework for how to do the three questions.

To sum up, this step should be completed in the following order: "Look at the problem, read through the material, outline the key sentences, concentrate initially and arrange the numbers". The first question is generally a summary of the main content of the material or the main problems reflected, which requires comprehensiveness, accuracy, conciseness and order (the writing must be concise, which is the basic requirement.

It is taboo to talk about it. Some people will write about Scientific Outlook on Development and Theory of Three Represents. Look back at the number column, pick out the problem part and expand it into a sentence.

But if you write papers one by one, even if you summarize them comprehensively and the language is concise and accurate, you will pass at most (I am not a marking teacher, this is just my opinion). The same below).

Because "organized" is not reflected. Coherent summary, shall not exceed 4 points, prohibited.

The second question, the second question and the third question are all related to the first question, but the two questions are more closely related. Therefore, it emphasizes the overall consideration of three issues.

The second question is generally to put forward countermeasures, and the third question is to write an argumentative essay on a topic of your choice. In fact, it is often to strengthen the countermeasures put forward in the second part. The second topic is the outline of countermeasures and the third topic is discussed in detail. Considering this, the second topic is unnecessary and should not be exaggerated.

The second question is generally limited to 300 to 400 words. Get to the point, write less or not at all. No need to summarize, no need to shout slogans.

These are all left in the third question. How to put forward countermeasures? There are two ways to "look back": one is to look back at the materials and find out the measures and countermeasures in the sentences outlined above, which are generally the views of experts, scholars and officials, as well as ordinary people.

Find them all. Renumber it.

Count to eight. Let's concentrate again, the classification of the same kind, four.

The second is to look back at the first question. What kind of problems should be solved.

A problem is facing a measure. Also note that some exams require that the title should be written for the second question or even the first question, and it is better to write the title.

This cannot be ignored. A friend mentioned the question of format. In fact, the writing of Shen Lun mainly examines the ability of candidates to put forward countermeasures and discusses them in a general style. The format review of the application document is not the key point, except that it is explicitly required to write a report to the higher authorities, and the format does not need special attention.

Some people think it's writing a composition, and then writing a title with four spaces. That's interesting. Just put the title in the middle. This is an application, not a composition. Sometimes the countermeasures of the second question and the third question are not exactly the same, and the number of items is also different. Personally, I think this is normal, because it is impossible to calculate all the strategies and design everything in advance in just two hours.

People's understanding is a deepening process. After answering one or two questions, the writing continued to advance and the feeling gradually came out. Deeper ideas are entirely possible. If there is nothing to write about the second and third questions, you can put the summary of the first question on the second and third questions.

Don't worry about repetition, because the teacher who marks the paper has one person for each question. This method is only used when there is nothing to write.

The first question is generally "summarize the problems reflected in the materials", and the second question is generally "put forward your countermeasures", and the requirements are very clear. The third topic is "write an article according to the main problems reflected in the material and choose your own point of view", which has certain flexibility and should be examined carefully. In most cases, and I think it is the simplest, safest and most conventional way, it is to elaborate the article put forward by the second question in detail and write perfunctorily with the countermeasures put forward by the second question as the framework.

However, some examiners will add interference factors to the examination language in order to examine candidates' ability to examine questions. If you don't pay attention, you will bypass it. There was a subtitle last year, which was already given, but many people took the time to draw up the subtitle themselves and gild the lily.

There is also the "optional angle". According to many counseling books, what measures are put forward? What's the point? From the opposite side, from the side, grasping is not as good as the rest, and seeing the big from the small ... Personally, I feel that many statements are flashy, because you are not writing a composition, skills or literary talent for the college entrance examination. These are useless and harmful, not others' scores. As I said above, what everyone wants to test you most is your comprehensive analysis and handling ability of the main problems reflected in the materials, that is, countermeasures. Application is application, what is this? This is strategy and countermeasure. Application is a strategy, and the core point is how to solve the problem.

So the third question lets you choose your own angle, but it's actually like an interview. Although there are no hard and fast rules about your dress, you still have only one choice: men's suits and women's dresses. That's the truth.

Moreover, the third question is enriched, developed and extended on the basis of the second question, which saves trouble in itself, because there is a ready-made foundation to lay there.

8. What should I do if I can't write a civil service examination application? It's not as difficult as I thought. It's actually just a routine. Some people are good at writing and logical, attracting people to score high. I think I can basically pass, and the more I accumulate, the higher my summary will be.

The following is my personal experience.

Formally, it is the first introduction, which leads to the following (* * * What has been done since …, what progress has been made, but what problems still exist).

The second layer of the status quo, put forward those problems that have appeared at present. (What are the specific phenomena)

The third level is solved, and the relative problems are broken one by one.

The fourth summary, thinking about all aspects of progress, policy support, etc. We must believe that it will be better. As the saying goes, if you lie more, you will believe it yourself. )

As for what is written on the third floor, in a word-you can say what the material says.

All the application materials I have read tell you to "find the answer from the materials". For example, the material says that "employees with lower wages are not motivated enough, and the brain drain is serious ...", you can answer "increase the corresponding wages and attract talents ...". Look at two sets of questions, and you will have a pair of eyes to find problems. When answering questions, use strokes to extract answers, which is convenient to find when answering questions. If you don't have enough excerpts and words. You can also choose some of the contents of the universal eight articles to supplement.

The eight universal rules are the following eight-point answers for civil servants:

1, leaders pay attention and raise awareness.

2. Strengthen publicity and create an atmosphere.

3. Improve the quality of education and training.

4, improve policies and regulations, improve the system.

5. Formation mechanism of organization and coordination.

6. Increase investment and rely on science and technology.

7. Strengthen supervision and fully implement it.

8. Summarize reflection and learn from experience.

Baidu Encyclopedia searches for "Universal Eight Articles", with more detailed supplements and limited space. See for yourself.

Look at several sets of real questions and answers over the years. The most important thing is to understand the connection between the materials and the answers during reading. You can sum up your own set of answering ideas. Try to write a few articles yourself, not many, and sum up with your heart.