Original title playback
This year, the question of whether to "cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools" has aroused heated discussion. Some people say, why can't universities get high school scores? Some people say that junior high school does not divide, why should high school divide? Some people think that dividing subjects is beneficial to personality development, while others think that not dividing subjects is beneficial to all-round quality training. Some people think that there is no way to cope with the college entrance examination without dividing subjects; Some people think that high school is not divided into subjects, and the college entrance examination will naturally not be divided into subjects.
Do you have any feelings, opinions or stories about this problem?
Please write an article on the topic of "canceling the division of arts and sciences in high school", and draw up your own title and style, not less than 800 words.
Material review
This is a topic composition of "material+topic". Although it is a topic composition, it is based on the characteristics of the times and is the focus of attention and heated discussion at present.
Let's talk about the interpretation of material subject first. It is divided into three levels, in the form of antithesis to express the views of the opposing sides:
1. From the divided time period, universities are divided into disciplines, so high schools are also divided into disciplines/junior high schools are not divided, so high schools cannot be divided.
2. From the point of view of the necessity of dividing subjects, it should be for the development of personality/for the comprehensive quality, so it should not be divided into subjects.
3. From the possibility of dividing subjects: In order to cope with the college entrance examination, it is unnecessary not to divide subjects/senior high school entrance examination.
The views of these three groups of "people" actually imply the angle and depth of our writing. It should be said that 1 has a shallow view, two views are real, three views are deep, penetrating and touching the essence! From the writing practice, it is common for us to choose the positive or negative side of the second level to make an argument, and it is also possible to choose the positive or negative side of the third level to make an argument, but the skills are a bit shallow and easy to be extreme.
Interpretation of the topic of "canceling the division of arts and sciences in senior high school" There is an important word "cancellation", which we should pay special attention to when making arguments. As the topic of verb-object structure, we often use the method of "adding morphemes" to express completely different views. The method of "adding morphemes" is a practical skill to deal with topic composition, that is, adding certain morphemes before or after the topic to make the point stand out, such as the following "adding" is very effective:
We must cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high school. It is imperative and necessary to cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high school. What is wrong with canceling the division of arts and sciences in senior high school? "The cancellation of liberal arts in high schools is tantamount to' increasing the burden'"
These titles are final, landing, clear-cut and firm.
Compare the following questions again:
My opinion on canceling the division of arts and sciences in high school, talking about canceling the division of arts and sciences in high school, thinking about canceling the division of arts and sciences in high school, and whether the division of arts and sciences in high school can be cancelled? 》
Although these topics are also called "adding morphemes", as argumentative papers, they obviously feel ambiguous and vague, and they are "universal questions". In the examination room, asking the examiner to "search" your answer is naturally greatly affected.
consider
"Do you have any feelings, opinions or understandings on this issue?" Don't underestimate this sentence, it actually hints at our ideas and even reminds us of what style we should adopt.
1. Views/traditional arguments.
2. Feeling/comment writing.
3. Knowledge/narrative.
In fact, no matter what style (custom style) we adopt, it is feasible to express our views on the topic of "canceling the division of arts and sciences in high school" The following ideas are all good:
◇ Idea 1: Conventional argumentative thinking.
Take "it is imperative to cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools" as an example;
1. Title: "It is imperative to cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools"
2. The first paragraph: The existence of illiteracy and scientific blindness → It is imperative to cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools.
3. Discipline: The cancellation of discipline is the need of personal quality improvement/personnel training/education reform.
Take "it is necessary to cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high school" as an example;
1. Title: "It is necessary to cancel the division of arts and sciences in high school"
2. The first paragraph: "360 lines, each line is the best." What society needs is professionals → It is not right to cancel the division of arts and sciences in high schools.
3. Discipline: The division of arts and sciences is the necessity of the education system/the division of arts and sciences conforms to the reality of talent training/the division of arts and sciences meets the needs of society.
◇ Idea 2: Comment on writing methods.
"Time" refers to current affairs, current situation, current situation, current politics, current situation and current disadvantages, and current commentary refers to writing articles around the word "time". According to this positioning, in short, "current commentary" is current affairs commentary.
The commentary is highly targeted and close to life. Reading such articles can help students understand all aspects of the country, pay attention to society and think about life. Keep the habit of reading news comments, keep up with the trend of the times, understand social trends and grasp social hot issues, so that when writing, you don't have to always look for materials in the "dead pile", let alone recite arguments mechanically.
Current commentary has become an important style in the current media, which can accommodate the confrontation of different views, carry the voice of the people, and let all kinds of voices have channels of expression. Therefore, this will be the focus of the content and form change of college entrance examination composition in recent years!
Two general writing methods of comments:
A. Matter-of-fact type: one thing, one discussion → comment (most students use this writing method)
B. Reasoning according to facts: universal meaning → discussion
The common structure of commentary: statement (material)-discussion (material)-link (material)-summary.
Take "in favor of the separation of arts and sciences" (which cannot be cancelled) as an example:
From the necessity/possibility of division.
Take "denying the division of arts and sciences" (which must be cancelled) as an example:
Knowledge structure/overall development/social needs
Take "behind the teacher" (essence) as an example:
Division of subjects and college entrance examination system; The division of disciplines is closely related to the talent mechanism.
Whether it is divided into disciplines is a topic that has never been determined;
The college entrance examination system has not changed, and all discussions and efforts are in vain;
What society wants is talents and professionals, not "generalists" and "generalists".
Idea 3: Narrative writing.
If you write a narrative, how to express your views on "canceling the division of arts and sciences in senior high school" Writing a narrative is not impossible, nor is it forbidden. As long as the theme of the narrative expresses your views on this issue, it meets the requirements. Evaluate the following statements:
Example: "It's all caused by different disciplines"
Neighbors have often quarreled in recent days. First, there are differences between uncles and aunts. First, Xiaofeng, a senior one, is also very upset and often comes to my place to be quiet. It turns out that it's all caused by different disciplines!
Xiaofeng is a boy with good taste, especially a scholar's feeling. Facing the division of subjects, he really wants to study liberal arts. In the future, he will approach the Chinese major, be his favorite writer and journalist, and cultivate his thoughts with pen and ink.
However, parents' attitudes are different. When the father of civil servants supports Xiaofeng to choose liberal arts, he will have an advantage in his future career; A well-informed mother thinks that her son should study science and have more employment opportunities. Only by doing what you can, can you have a good future. There is only one child, and the parents don't want to delay the child's life, and even almost divorced.
It is caused by different disciplines!
As a college student, I think I should help Xiaofeng convince his parents. I do the work of both sides, look at the branches rationally, and finally make Xiaofeng's family harmonious as ever.
Fanwenyin road
What's wrong with the liberal arts division in senior high school?
□ Senior 3 (2) Class Xiang Zhi
In recent years, the education departments all over the country have been quarrelling with each other about canceling the division of arts and sciences in high schools. I believe that the division of arts and sciences will certainly broaden students' horizons, improve the overall quality and personal development of the whole people, and let a person absorb today's culture more effectively. From this point of view, this is indeed a useful measure. But in my opinion, it is not practical to cancel the division of arts and sciences, but it will be self-defeating and counterproductive.
The most common and deep-rooted drawback of canceling the division of arts and sciences is to increase the burden on students, make them feel physically and mentally exhausted, and their eyesight drops, so that they are tired of learning and cannot learn knowledge in depth. We call for "reducing the burden" every day. Is it the so-called "burden reduction" to cancel the division of arts and sciences? On the contrary, it increases the pressure of study and will only stifle students' imagination and creativity. Imagine if a nation loses these, what will its future be like? It will be stagnant and unable to move forward to a higher level. Let's take a long-term view. Western countries advocate individualized education. It is precisely because of this that students' thinking ability has been stimulated, and a large number of Nobel Prize winners have emerged in the West. Why the Nobel Prize winners in China for hundreds of years are equal to "0" is because of the long-term curriculum pressure and heavy study tasks. Students only know how to write and calculate numbly in the pile of books, waiting for the teacher to spoon-feed them in class. In this way, it is not surprising that there are many "talents" with high scores and low abilities in society.
Objectively speaking, the abolition of the division of arts and sciences will have a great impact on the development of students who are "partial to literature" or "partial to science". Because of the integration of arts and sciences, they have learned arts and sciences carelessly, and their talents in a certain aspect have not been well exercised and practiced, resulting in the gradual decline of elites in all walks of life. Man is not a god, and it is impossible to master every aspect. Since he can't be perfect in all aspects, why not pay attention to one or two aspects of training? Does the country really only need "generalists" but not "talents" who do well in a certain field? In society, different people occupy different fields, and their job is to do their own tasks brilliantly. Many people may never use other knowledge. It is said that time is precious, and education strongly advocates cherishing time. Cherishing time means that students spend more time and energy memorizing and reciting subjects that are of little use to them.
As we all know, the division of arts and sciences in high school stems from students' choice of study according to their own interests; Liberal arts students can't understand complicated mathematics and physics, and science students know nothing about Du Li and Confucius and Mencius, but they still do well after graduation. Suddenly faced with so many courses, can everyone learn? Obviously, a seedling can only thrive if it absorbs a proper amount of water "food". If you suddenly drink too much nutrition, the consequences will be unknown.
From this point of view, the cancellation of liberal arts in high schools is only a matter of human feelings. It seems that students learn both arts and sciences and have high quality. But on second thought, can they bear it? Does it hurt those special students? Will students' creativity be stifled? Can everyone learn? Most problems need people from all walks of life to think deeply.
The voice of experts
Whether to cancel the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools is a question being considered by the Ministry of Education, a topic being considered by NPC deputies and one of the top ten livelihood topics in 2009. Therefore, it has aroused widespread concern in society.
Xiaoxiang morning herald: a system that tears the integrity of education.
Arts and sciences run through the high school education stage, and students are still ignorant. Their academic interests and future destiny are determined by the hands of the system. In fact, the school just wants to separate arts and sciences, and then dump knowledge, so that students can become a knowledge receiving device, and finally achieve the goal of contributing to the decimal point of the enrollment rate.
Anything that helps to improve the enrollment rate will be unscrupulous; Anything that doesn't help is thrown away like a lost shoe. This is why high school liberal arts subjects have been criticized repeatedly, but they are still unmoved.
The knowledge gained by liberal arts students is closed and fragmented, and the fragmented understanding cannot cover up the weakness of the overall grasp. As soon as they jump out of their professional fields, they immediately become left, right and even ignorant.
Can China become a master figure with both scientific spirit and humanistic feelings? We don't know. But we know that an education system that tears the integrity of education can only make our hopes drift away. In this way, it is time to shake off the historical dust of liberal arts and sciences.
Big river. Com: there is nothing wrong with division, but the fault lies in local division.
As a beneficiary of subject education, I have never deeply felt the disadvantages of subject education. In the final analysis, there is nothing wrong with dividing subjects, and the fault lies in partial subjects.
In fact, the division of arts and sciences in senior high school has relieved quite a few students' weariness of learning, made them realize the necessity of learning again, and then "there is specialization in the technical field", and some students gave up the subjects they don't want to learn and can't learn well long ago. This is the correct understanding of arts and sciences. I really don't know how many people drop out of school because of difficulties if it is not compulsory to divide subjects.
"Learning without thinking is useless, and thinking without learning is dangerous." Regardless of arts and sciences, learning is too heavy, and there are only two situations of "learning without thinking" and "thinking without learning" in limited time. By the same token, if you are good at "thinking" after studying liberal arts, you will consciously browse science knowledge; If you study science and are good at thinking, you will love liberal arts knowledge. Because "thinking" at the same time, there is no pressure in the exam and it will have good results.
Dividing subjects saves all students' time, and the phenomenon of partial subjects can only explain the utilitarian purpose of some people studying for exams. Studying for the "test" may lead to more and more serious partiality.
In fact, there is a phenomenon that some people study science for two years but switch to liberal arts, while others study liberal arts for two years and switch to science. Why is this happening? Just because I found myself at the wrong door. It should be said that there is a difference between liberal arts and professional disciplines in universities. The division of arts and sciences is only the classification of basic knowledge, and specialty is the key direction of knowledge sublimation. If you equate major with sub-discipline, you will inevitably have the illusion of "guilty" of sub-discipline.
Ganlong Com: There is nothing wrong with dividing subjects, but the exam is the culprit.
The separation of arts and sciences does have its drawbacks and losses, but everything must be viewed from both sides, and the separation of arts and sciences also has its advantages. For example, in the case of a solid foundation in arts and sciences, you can "specialize in the industry." In so-called developed countries such as Europe and the United States, there is also the separation of arts and sciences, which does not seem to affect the overall quality and humanistic care of their nation.
Some people blame the liberal arts for China people's failure to win the Nobel Prize, which not only makes people see that the Nobel Prize complex is so thick, almost morbid, but also has the suspicion of putting the cart before the horse. Experts and scholars in some countries have won the Nobel Prize for a long time, but their scientific and technological level and national quality are still backward. We can't equate a country's science and technology or related level, or even related honors with the Nobel Prize.
Obviously, it is unreasonable to accuse China people of not winning the Nobel Prize in liberal arts. However, it is putting the cart before the horse to focus on the decline of the overall quality of the nation and the lack of scientific spirit and humanistic feelings. Because everyone with discerning eyes knows that the main reason that hinders the development of education in China is that quality education has not been really implemented, rather than the trivial practice of separating arts and sciences.
For decades, we have been shouting the slogan of "all-round development of morality, intelligence, physique and beauty", and quality education has also been written into the document. However, these are still just slogans. This is a place where education departments and schools must seriously reflect.
The theory of "increasing the burden" is nonsense.
Canceling the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools is the key to promoting students' quality education. Therefore, we must start with the reform of the college entrance examination system. It is in the college entrance examination, regardless of arts and sciences. As for saying that such reform will increase the burden on middle school students, it is completely nonsense. According to this logic, if the college entrance examination only takes one course, wouldn't the burden on students be reduced to a minimum? Starting from the long-term plan of improving students' social quality, I ask the Ministry of Education to realize the college entrance examination as soon as possible. —— Member Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and Academician Zheng of China Academy of Sciences.
Substituting elective courses for subjects can divide classes.
The division of arts and sciences is the product of the current examination system. After years of practice, the disadvantages of the division of arts and sciences in senior high schools have been highlighted. The lack of comprehensive advantages of arts and sciences will make students lack creativity, and its potential harm will gradually emerge when students become adults; In addition, with the increasing difficulty of science examination, the knowledge of literature such as history and geography, which has benefited students for life, has lost its due position in science study. What's more, science students are obviously superior to liberal arts students, and they are treated differently when they are sent to universities. We believe that elective courses can be set up on the basis of ensuring normal teaching in senior high schools, and comprehensive exercises in arts and sciences can be put into elective courses. Students can choose freely according to their own needs, so as to avoid the situation that every student reviews arts and sciences at the same time in the review stage of college entrance examination and reduce the learning pressure. Central Committee of the Agricultural Workers' Party
On the Reform of College Entrance Examination System
The college entrance examination system is not reformed, and the discussion of arts and sciences is also a white discussion. To put it bluntly, arts and sciences are discussed separately, and it is useless to unify if opinions are not unified. You know, in our country, students learn what the college entrance examination takes. The baton of the college entrance examination has not changed, and all discussions will be very funny. The comprehensive quality of candidates must be taken as the basis for admission. —— Member Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and Academician Zhu Qingshi of China Academy of Sciences
Hope to adopt. . .