The probability of G-type candidates encountering discussion articles is relatively high, and the probability of A-type candidates encountering pure discussion articles is relatively small, but it must be clear because the probability of A-type candidates encountering mixed questions is relatively high. Moreover, understanding the difference between argumentative writing and discussion writing is also conducive to dealing with oral questions. Is the examiner in Part 1, especially in Part3? Discussion text? Together? Argumentative essay? Repeated bombing, if you don't fully understand the difference between the two, often digress and score relatively low. Let's have a look, shall we? Analysis of the basic writing principles of IELTS discussion papers. ? The most common discussion in writing is about the cause, influence and solution of a social problem or thing. But the three will not come out together, and generally two of these three aspects will be chosen to investigate. Of course, the most common does not mean that there are no other situations. Here are some examples that readers can see at a glance. Because the writing technique of argumentative writing is simpler than argumentative writing, experts often use methods to increase the difficulty in topic design, so candidates must pay special attention.

Discuss the basic writing principles of the article;

1. This discussion is indisputable.

2. Ask questions or other ways to determine whether concentration is the cause, influence or solution. Two questions must have two focuses.

Never deny the premise defined in the background of the topic.

Pay attention to several aspects when writing discussion articles:

1. There are often two questions in the topic, so be sure that they are all discussion papers and not mixed questions. Mixed questions also have two problems, one of which is argumentative or pros and cons.

2. The most common logical mistake of candidates is to confuse the cause and the result. If the topic requires writing reasons, but the candidate writes about the impact, it will be regarded as a digression, and vice versa.

3. If it is required to write a solution in the way of asking questions, then the solution should not be compared, and it is better to have a clear so-called corresponding relationship with the reasons or results mentioned above.

4. Generally speaking, the two problems are completed by two main parts.

5. Because the focus of the question method is fixed, the comparison often cannot cover all the contents of the topic background, so it is necessary to consider the overall situation mentioned in the topic background many times in combination with the focus and comparison to avoid missing important information.