? In his speech act theory, linguist Austin divides performative sentences into three types: referring to things with words, doing things with words and deeds, and doing things with words. We borrow Austin's term "referring to things in words". Do you think taboo words in language are also? What does this mean? , refers to the things and ideas that people avoid in the objective world, so it is taboo. Taboo? What does this mean? It can be roughly divided into three categories: personal pronoun reference, proper noun reference and common noun reference. Is it confusing that people are afraid of these words? Signifier? And then what? What do you mean? The relationship between.
? Related papers: college students' papers, industrial and commercial finance papers, economic papers, educational papers? Popular graduation thesis
Paper Keywords Austin; Speech act theory; Taboo words; That makes sense.
First, taboo words? What does this mean? Nature of
Austin, a linguist, put forward in his speech act theory that human speech is not only the use of language, but also an act, that is, doing things by speaking. He divided speech acts into two categories: declarative sentences (consta? Positive) and acting sentences. Later, Austin further divided performative sentences into three types: referring to things with words (1ocutionaryact), teaching by example with words, and achieving things with words (or taking effect with words). The greatest feature of Austin's speech act theory is to grasp verbal communication? Human factors? This paper expounds that the communication unit is not a sentence but a sentence expressing the speaker's intention, linking the use of language with the speaker, and the use of language symbols with? Self? Objection.
When we apply Austin's speech act theory to the study of taboo, we find that taboo, as a relatively special language phenomenon, exists and is recognized by people because of its symbolism and sociality of language symbols: its symbolism makes people directly correspond its signifier to various things or concepts that people are afraid of, and even regard it as the thing itself; Its sociality is due to the fact that people in the speech social group have the same cognitive habits of taboo words, so in the conversation between the two sides, most communicators think that the use of certain words refers to something, so they are taboo about the use of these words.
Taboo refers to something, which is borrowed from Austin's saying that words refer to things, but it is not exactly the same as Austin's saying that words refer to things. More like the equivalent in structuralism? Meaning? what's up What do you mean? In other words, some language symbols are taboo in what the speaker says, because they refer to some objective things or concepts that people are taboo in the objective world. What if Austin's words express things through words? What do you mean? So what do these taboos mean? Things and ideas that people avoid? .