Although some people think that Lu Xun's works should not be deleted, because Lu Xun's works are classics, Lu Xun's works have profound ideological connotations. If we discard them, we will only have a vulgar and disgusting fast food culture. Who will save the decadent soul of society? But I have a different view on this.
I think there is some truth in the publishing house's approach, and it is worthwhile to discuss this topic. I read a book called "Harmonious Society and China of Marxist Philosophy" the other day, and discussed the route of Marxism in China in the introduction. The reason why China wants to build a harmonious society is determined by today's national conditions and future development trends. Therefore, building a harmonious society is an innovative process combining theory with practice. However, Marx's summary of the times at that time obviously can't meet the requirements of today's times, because new practice needs new theories, which requires us to choose new ideological tools from Marx's ideological treasure house, carry out transformation and innovation under the premise of adapting to the theme of the times, and apply practice in the process of building a harmonious society.
Because Marx's philosophy needs innovation with the continuous progress of the social times, it is not difficult to understand that some articles of Lu Xun were deleted by the publishing house. Our Chinese nation has a long history, and Mr. Lu Xun's works are indeed profound and rich in connotation, but Mr. Lu Xun's literary works can only represent the social background of a specific era, from which some problems are mapped out, so as to achieve the purpose of saving people's hearts. But it is impossible for an article to break away from the fixed time category. Because society is constantly developing and progressing, we should also adapt to the needs of the times. Social change has its own laws, and no one can violate them. Therefore, Lu Xun's article cannot be said to be outdated, because there are many things worth studying, studying and sublimating. But what belongs to that era, let's seal it in that particular era.
Therefore, in my opinion, the reason why the publishing house wants to delete Lu Xun's articles is naturally reasonable, perhaps with an attitude of taking the essence and discarding the dross. Everyone in China is not Lu Xun alone. We should learn from many aspects, not just one. The old spirit needs to be inherited and the new spirit needs to be carried forward. You can't put all your eggs in one basket. You should cultivate yourself from all angles and become the fuel for the progress of the times.