Post-disaster thinking

Recently, there have been many landslides in my hometown, especially in Tengchong County, where 29 people died. After the disaster, it seems to be a conditioned reflex, and we are all thinking deeply.

There are many reasons for disasters, such as rainstorm, unstable geological foundation, serious destruction of mountain vegetation, etc ... But the frequent occurrence of rainstorm is beyond human control, and unstable geological foundation is an unchangeable reality, but mountain vegetation can be effectively protected, but people just lack the awareness of protection. A forest fire destroyed many forests years ago, and the mountain itself was ruthlessly destroyed by quarrying, which greatly increased the probability and harm of landslides. Coupled with the abnormal weather this year, it is out of season, which eventually leads to tragedy.

People are used to being wise after the event. When the tragic disaster happened, the government sent armed police officers and soldiers to stop quarrying overnight. We can't help asking, why did you go early Must someone die before taking action? Quarrying stones and cutting mountains has economic benefits, but it is a business of eating ancestral rice and cutting off the rice of future generations. How can it last? Facts have also proved that the ultimate victim of this behavior is ourselves.

In the face of disasters, ordinary people can only take precautions in peacetime, and government departments should really play their role, including peacetime prevention, and the government should actively guide them. But what we see is that as long as there is money, disaster is another matter. It is a miracle that this carelessness did not lead to disaster. Why don't government departments turn a blind eye? Have money to take it? Maybe that's just one of the reasons. Government agencies are jumbled, and shirking responsibility may be a bigger reason than money. In addition, we can't ignore the so-called key projects and ignore the infrastructure construction. Taking last year's drought in Chongqing as an example, some people pointed out that the Three Gorges Project was the culprit, so it is difficult for us to talk about the construction of the Three Gorges. However, it should be noted that the rural water conservancy facilities in Chongqing are really not optimistic, at least indicating that the country has neglected Chongqing, especially the rural areas in Chongqing, when attaching importance to the Three Gorges. This year, Chongqing suffered another big flood, so we have to re-examine the Three Gorges. After all, Dujiangyan is successful, why don't we learn from it?

Everyone likes to think after a disaster, but few people remember the pain of the disaster after thinking. The heavy rain is still pouring down, and leaders at all levels are still inspecting the disaster situation, but street vendors doing business are still creating potential threats. Leftover meals are poured directly into the sewer. If the heavy rain continues, the sewage will inevitably overflow, the smell is not good, and some diseases will be brought. Who will benefit? It's not good for anyone!

Disasters include natural disasters and man-made disasters. If everyone consciously protects the environment and the government departments earnestly perform their duties, the disaster will be far away from us, and there will be no need to be wise after the event. More importantly, for ourselves and future generations, the fear of disaster and the grief of human death will be alleviated.

Test analysis: "thinking" means writing an argumentative essay. First of all, we should understand the general idea of an argumentative paper, that is, ask questions, analyze problems and summarize problems. From the many questions raised in the guide, choose one that makes you feel easily as the central topic. For example, some students heard that classes were suspended because of bad weather in some places, so they looked forward to the bad weather and thought about this kind of selfish understanding. Let's put this misunderstanding aside and ask, "Did we really expect bad weather?" Problems, and then use a lot of facts (arguments) from the serious harm of disaster weather, including the impact on normal study and life to analyze the problem. Finally, after taking care of the "problems" in the last article, I come to the conclusion that we should get rid of the wrong understanding of "nothing to do with ourselves" and "nothing to do with ourselves" and advocate a good fashion of caring for others and society.