It is also necessary.
But to be clear, there are several positive problems:
What is the essence of the thesis, and what kind of talents may produce the thesis.
Only people with rich technical and practical experience can write articles and exchange experiences in technology for the purpose of popularizing the public.
It's just that this is a meaningless paper.
Papers are linked to titles, and different titles should be strictly distinguished.
Not all people can write so-called papers, and not all people can write papers only if they have made achievements in their majors.
Especially for young people, young practitioners who have no work and practical experience, writing a thesis is tantamount to "driving ducks to the shelves", out of thin air!
In addition, even people with considerable practical experience and professional achievements are not necessarily "masters" in writing papers, and professional achievements should not be evaluated only by papers.
Therefore, the thesis can be used as an element of professional title evaluation, but it is not the only one. There should be equivalent conditions or alternative conditions.
Otherwise, it will lead to blind pursuit of papers and neglect of practice accumulation, and in the end it will only be one day!
It harms the development of industry and technology and is not conducive to the cultivation of talents in the industry.
In addition, when participating in the evaluation of professional titles, the paper should strictly distinguish different professional titles.
The so-called thesis should be a higher-level requirement and should not be a necessary condition.
What is the ultimate purpose of the paper?
The only purpose of this paper is to promote technology and communication within the industry. Therefore, the ultimate goal of this paper is technology accumulation and exchange.
But now the paper only evaluates the professional title. Deviated from the fundamental purpose of the paper.
Therefore, from the definition and purpose of the paper, the paper is aimed at the development of industries and departments.
Instead of publishing papers in so-called high-ranking journals, it is better to use this as a standard for evaluating rankings, and it is better to exchange experience and technology between departments and industries. This is more conducive to promoting the exchange of technology, but also more conducive to the cultivation of talents.
Therefore, from the ultimate goal of the paper, the paper can be used as an element and standard of professional title evaluation, but it is not the only standard. Promoting communication and personnel training is the only purpose of this article.