Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - The evaluation criteria of methodology papers are generally based on three elements.
The evaluation criteria of methodology papers are generally based on three elements.
Generally speaking, the evaluation criteria of methodology papers are innovation, academic significance and application value according to three major elements.

Scientific papers, also known as original papers or documents in information science, are scientific analysis, comprehensive research and exposition of phenomena (or problems) in the fields of natural science, engineering technology science and humanities and arts research by scientific and technical personnel or other researchers on the basis of scientific experiments (or experiments), as well as further research on some phenomena and problems.

Summarize and innovate other achievements and conclusions, and express them in electronic and written form according to the requirements of various scientific journals.

Academic nature: Academic nature is the main feature of scientific papers. It takes academic achievements as the object of expression and academic viewpoints as the core of the paper. On the premise of scientific experiments, it expounds academic achievements and viewpoints, reveals the objective laws of the development and changes of things, explores the objective truth in the field of science and technology, and promotes the development of science and technology. Academic strength is the standard to measure the value of scientific papers.

Second, innovation: scientific papers must be studied by the author himself, and the new progress or breakthrough of scientific theories, methods or practices should reflect new ideas, methods and achievements different from those of predecessors, so as to improve the citation rate of academic colleagues at home and abroad.

Third, it is scientific: the content of the paper must be objective and true, qualitative and quantitative accurate, and it is not allowed to be false at all, and it must stand the test of others' repetition and practice; The expression of the paper should also be scientific, the discussion should be clear and unambiguous, and the language should be accurate and standardized.