The so-called difference between monarch and minister means that the rights of monarch and minister are different. At the beginning, the monarch and the minister got along very well, and they all called from the farmland. The Almighty is the monarch, and the one who is second only to the monarch is the minister. However, the relationship between the monarch and the minister is good, and there are not many contradictions. No emperor wants to rule the world with tyranny at the beginning of the dynasty, and no minister wants to overthrow the New Deal with rebellion at the beginning of the dynasty. < & lt； He said: "At the beginning of the dynasty, the monarch and ministers lived in harmony and ruled by contrast, and the country became more and more prosperous." That is to say, of course, every dynasty is like the beginning, the middle and the end you said, and it greatly said, "Since ancient times, kingship has been inseparable." Yes, in the middle of the dynasty, the king's power increased day by day, and his national strength became richer and stronger. Kings of past dynasties valued power, supplemented by the people. So (from my own point of view) it is natural to be a little overwhelmed when choosing a minister. However, at the end of a dynasty, generations of kings lived a stable and comfortable life, gradually became fatuous, and did not care much about state affairs. In the end, relying on the minister becomes what you call a weak monarch and a strong minister. At this level, a country's power struggle will become more and more fierce.