Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Urgently seek an argumentative paper or argument on the topic of empathy.
Urgently seek an argumentative paper or argument on the topic of empathy.
People who can't tolerate others don't deserve to be tolerated ―― Bert Neikes.

-inscription

Tolerance is a virtue, but how can we really tolerate others? I think a very important way is to learn to put yourself in the other person's shoes.

When you learn to put yourself in others' shoes, you will see the problem from others' point of view and put yourself in others' shoes when encountering problems. However, only by doing this can we understand and tolerate others more. In life, you should learn to put yourself in others' shoes. When in conflict with classmates, turn enemies into friends and rebuild good friendship. When you encounter setbacks, you might as well turn negativity into hope, and the sunshine will smile at you. When we learn to put ourselves in other's shoes, we will find that life is actually beautiful and we are in a good mood every day.

"There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand readers" is really incisive. Yes, you may think Hamlet is a coward who is only keen on thinking and afraid of practice, but I think his sentence "To be or not to be, that is a question" is extremely profound.

Reading is like this, but isn't it the same in life? Different life, different environment, different outlook on life and different ways of thinking ―― different identities determine different angles of thinking. Maybe two people's ideas will conflict, but please put yourself in each other's shoes, and the resentment or anger that pours into your heart will disappear. Just like Hamlet in the eyes of readers, who can tell which one is absolutely right? No, so we should tolerate each other's views and put ourselves in the other's shoes, so that we can have a more thorough understanding of this comedy.

When the same flower is placed in front of us, there will be a kind of "flowers are flying all over the sky, who pity the red fragrance?" There will also be a deep feeling that "falling red is not a heartless thing, but turning into mud will protect flowers more."

A bright moon hangs in the night sky, and Zhang Hui sings the idea that "whoever sees the moon at the first sight by the river will shine on the people at the beginning of the river", and will sigh the homesickness of "the foot of my bed is so bright and the ground is frosty".

Can you criticize Sister Lin's Sadness under the Fence? Can you deny the fact that the flowers are gone? Can you blame Zhang for moaning? Can you despise white nostalgia? I'm afraid neither. Therefore, we should learn to put ourselves in the shoes, appreciate the rich connotation of a flower, and feel the same moon that was once so affectionate.

Learn to put yourself in the shoes, and you won't walk past those begging hands with a cold face. Today, there will be a beggar with a full stomach. Learn to put yourself in others' shoes, and you won't laugh at the cleaners on the road. You will be supported by the concept of "glorious labor". Learn to put yourself in the other's shoes, and you will never see your friends again. Perhaps, learn to put yourself in the other person's shoes, and the days are old!

However, empathy is not a light word. To learn it, we must have a broad mind, broad tolerance and considerate heart.

If you are ready, please take an open mind and learn to put yourself in the other's shoes. You will find that the world could have been so beautiful, life could have been so rich, and spirit could have been so full.

1+ 1=? Different people will have different calculation methods and come to different conclusions and answers. Mathematicians have spent half their lives trying to prove that 1+ 1=2. Some people say, "1+ 1=3 is a writer. 1+ 1=2 is a mathematician. 1+ 1=0 is a philosopher. " Yes, mathematicians are seeking truth from facts, that is, science cannot be false at all; Writers like to process the original story and exaggerate the facts.

Glory in the pen; Philosophers look at both sides of a question, so they return to zero. Imagine writers, mathematicians and philosophers sitting together and discussing 1+ 1=? On the topic, I believe that they will all come up with the basis that they think the answer is correct, but they are not convinced of each other. Because they only look at the same problem from their own standpoint, because different standpoints will produce different viewpoints, and different viewpoints will lead to different results. Looking at the whole society, it is the same. Because different people may handle one thing in different ways, and the result may be even different.

Empathy, things are not absolute. Everything has two sides. When we disagree with others, we might as well put ourselves in their shoes, consider some problems from each other's point of view, and deal with them from each other's point of view and our environment. It is possible that some conflicts that we can't reconcile at first sight will enter the realm of "another village" because of our empathy. Please learn to put yourself in others' shoes!