1. Research on Ideological Education
Ideological education research (monthly) was founded in 1985, sponsored by the national ideological and political education research association of colleges and universities. After more than 20 years' construction, the journal has become the guiding journal and the core journal of ideological and political education in colleges and universities all over the country, and has made important contributions to promoting ideological and political work and construction of ideological and political education in colleges and universities. Main columns: expert opinions, discipline construction, moral education forum, observation and thinking, practical exploration, theoretical discussion, party building in colleges and universities, and special research.
This journal includes: Humanities Extension (version 20 18), Chinese Core (version 20 17), RCC SE (a) (2017-2018), and CSSCI Source Journal (20/kloc-0).
I wrote a manuscript. Actually, the style is not suitable for this magazine, but I voted with a try attitude. E-mail is submitted for one month. If you see the group saying that there is no reply for 1 month, you can call and ask. After answering the phone, the editor said that the articles not included recently were suggested to be changed. So, magazines are good.
After submitting 1 month, I was told that it needed to be revised. According to the opinions of two external auditors, the article was reduced to 1 1000 words and published the next month. This periodical is published very quickly, and it has never been over-written. If you haven't received the notice for two months, it's basically passed. The editor's attitude is particularly good, and the periodical is conscientious and does not exist. As long as you do it with your heart, you will have good results!
I have submitted several articles, but I have never heard from them. An article submitted to the platform by the website in June last year has been pending for more than a year. . . The authors of this journal are mostly manuscripts of ideological and political experts, or the second author is at least a doctoral tutor and professor. Hey! The winning rate is lower than buying lottery tickets.
2. Teacher education research
Research on Teacher Education (bimonthly) was founded in 1989. It is an educational and teaching periodical sponsored by Beijing Normal University, East China Normal University and Beijing Teacher Training and Exchange Center of the Ministry of Education. Purpose: to advocate academic innovation, promote academic exchanges, improve academic level, and comprehensively study and solve theoretical and practical problems of teacher education. Offering columns: mainly including the construction of new teacher education system, system innovation, training mode, teacher specialization, educational modernization, continuing education, discipline construction, curriculum and teaching materials, teaching exploration, team building, management and evaluation, educational experiment, teachers and students, educational psychology and educational principles.
The journals are: Humanities Core (20 18 edition), Chinese Core (20 17 edition), RCC SE (a) (2017-2018) and CSSCI source journals (20/kloc-0).
1) Submitted in May152) The external audit started on June 19, and two experts were sent. 3) Around August 15, an additional expert was found in the external audit. I don't know why. Nobody answered the phone. 4) I made a phone call on September 8, and the editor was very nice. It was learned that there was one more expert. Because 1 experts who had already been audited had no feedback, the external audit of this expert was terminated and another expert was sent. However, the editor himself said that the submission time was nearly 1 month, and promised to urge the experts to complete the review comments as soon as possible. 5) After a week, there is still no further comment. When you make a call, there will be a fax sound, but no one answers.
It was submitted at the beginning of May, the initial screening lasted for about a week, the initial trial lasted for half a month, the external trial began at the end of May, the first withdrawal was about three weeks, and the second withdrawal was at the end of July. It's almost a month now. The third external trial, whether it can pass the external trial or not, should have the result soon.
I voted twice, once last year, and the audit period was eight months. Finally, it was rejected, and there was no reason to refuse. I did it again at the end of the year, and five months later, I was still outside the trial. I contacted the editorial department once, and the editor replied to the external audit in the shortest three months, and it was not capped (it seems that they are not very good at urging the external audit). You must be patient enough to contribute to this journal, you can only wait forever.
It took nearly 10 months from submission to final notice of employment, during which the article was revised, edited carefully and with a good attitude. The academic evaluation of this journal is very high, but the employment cycle is relatively long.
3. Educational development research
Journals include: Humanities Core (version 20 18), Chinese Core (version 20 17), RCC SE (a+) (2017-2018), and CSSCI source journals (20/kloc-).
Research on Educational Development is regarded as an authoritative B-type periodical in many colleges and universities, and the quality of the papers in the periodical is very high, so it is still difficult to publish. There will be audit results about 45 days after submission, and you will be contacted directly if the audit passes. Including the revision of data, charts and texts, editors and editors are very responsible and attentive, and the whole process will make people gain a lot. Because it is bimonthly, it will be published soon. Teacher Lin has been committed to running professional journals with temperature, giving young people many opportunities and not discriminating against graduate students going it alone. You can try it while ensuring the quality of the article!
Official website didn't contribute this, so he needs to contact the editorial department himself. 985 is studying for a master's degree, and she is working as a tutor. Because the school is in Shanghai and has been to the Academy of Education, it is convenient to contact the editor. I sent two articles to the editor at a time. About a week later, the editor sent a message saying that one of them was more innovative and the other was directly rejected. But it needs a big change. Everything has changed except the core point of view. The intermediate revision took more than two months and I contacted an editor. The editor said it needed to be revised, and I revised it twice. Personally, I prefer theoretical and speculative articles, and my views must be innovative. Send it to the editor for the last time and say it's accepted. There seems to be no external trial.
4. Contemporary educational science
Journals include: Humanities Core (20 18 edition), Chinese Core (20 17 edition), RCC SE (a-) (2065438+07-2065438+08), VIP Collection, Wanfang Collection, HowNet Collection and Superstar Collection.
Periodicals are slow to review, first of all, they pass the preliminary examination without receiving the notice within two weeks, followed by two weeks+one month of external examination. Of course, the service attitude of the editorial department is still very good, whether it is email or telephone, you can feedback the news or connect it in time. However, I feel that the impact factor of periodicals is slightly lower, and now I am facing a new round of periodical grading. . .
There was no notice for two weeks after the first trial, and there was no news for more than a month. During the second trial, I asked twice. I saw that the authors in the same batch had been informed. I waited for two months to ask and told them that the second trial failed. Still need to continue to work hard!
I voted several times and finally won one. Submitted on April 5, 2020, the review period is usually February, because the previous vote was silently changed for two months, and this time there is no hope at all. I checked the manuscript by email on May 20, thinking that I had never won this journal before anyway. If I didn't pass it, I would change it quickly to save some time. I received the employment notice at noon that day, and the release date is scheduled for June. It will be published soon, and it will not discriminate against the solo works of the master. However, the journals tend to focus on articles on educational theory, and the number is relatively small.
5. "University Education Management"
The audit speed is relatively fast, and the reply was given in about 7 days. My article is based on my master's thesis, but my master's thesis is on HowNet. The reviewer's opinion is that your manuscript has been reviewed by the editorial department and found to be informative, clear in structure and clear in language. Unfortunately, your article is not suitable for publication in our journal, so you can change it to another journal for publication. I feel that the editor has a good attitude, and I have read the manuscript at least once, which is rare.
From the submission at the end of 20 19, to the external audit, and then to the external audit repair, it was revised five times (of which 1 time was sent to the external audit). Results After nearly a month's final review, the manuscript was directly rejected! After tossing and turning for half a year.
A super heavy periodical. After I submitted the manuscript, I carefully revised it three times according to the requirements of peer review. The last modification was to adjust the statement (at this point, I thought it should be okay). Enter the final review three months after submission. After more than 1 month final review, the manuscript was rejected. A total of more than four months have been wasted.
6. The development of higher education under evaluation
The journals are: Humanities Core (20 18), Chinese Core (20 17), RCC SE (a-) (2017-2018), CSSCI Extended Edition (20/kloc-).
Mail the paper version, deliver it on April 25th, sign for it on April 28th, send it to the second instance on May 6th, and notify the editor to modify the employment on June 28th. The audit period is 2 months. For a long time, I called the editor to communicate. Because the advice given by an expert was not very good, the editor thought the article was not bad, so he chose another expert to review it. I felt lucky, the editor was also very good and the communication was smooth.
Due to the delay in reviewing the manuscript during the epidemic, it passed the preliminary examination in one month and received the employment notice in more than one day. According to the external auditor's opinion, my topic is too humble and unnecessary, so I suggest it directly. In addition, I was asked to correct two words, saying that one word was used for life and the other was used improperly. So the manuscript was hired. This experience made me find it difficult to publish discussion articles, so I am particularly grateful and happy that Development and Evaluation of Higher Education can hire my manuscript. I don't think it needs much effort.
For more questions about the submission of educational journals, please consult me.
As one of the main pillars of China's national economy, forestry has played a vital role in promoting the sustainable development of China. The following are