1. quarrel

Argumentative essay is the author's views and opinions on the topics in argumentative essay. Every argumentative paper has at least one argument. Sometimes, because of the complexity of the topic, in order to make the argument clear, a central argument will be set in the same argumentative paper, and then it will be decomposed into several sub-arguments or small arguments, which will be demonstrated one by one through the method of divide and conquer, analyzed layer by layer, and finally demonstrated the central argument. At the same time, a good argument should follow four requirements: (1) correctness; (2) clarity; (3) concentration; (4) consistency.

Step 2 argue

Argumentation is the basis of argumentation, which makes it concrete and materialized. Some arguments are factual arguments, such as specific people, events and data. There are also some theoretical arguments, such as principles, laws, rules and famous sayings that have been recognized. Relatively speaking, factual argument is not as extensive, authoritative and theoretical as theoretical argument, but it has unique advantages in pertinence, vividness and popularity. In fact, for some complicated arguments, the two are often used interchangeably. The choice of good arguments should also follow certain requirements: (1) correctness; (2) typicality; (3) correlation; (4) integrity.

demonstrate

Argumentation is the method and process of proving an argument with arguments. It mainly organizes arguments and arguments according to certain logical relations to prove that the arguments are correct and credible. The purpose of argument is to reveal the internal logical relationship between arguments. Logically speaking, argumentative writing is a series of reasoning and proof by using concepts and judgments, and it is an important step to link arguments with arguments in argumentative writing.

Argument, argument and argumentation are the three elements of argumentative writing. Among them, debate is the soul, debate is the flesh and blood, and debate is the bone. Argumentation is to solve the problem of "what to prove", argument is to solve the problem of "what to prove" and argument is to solve the problem of "how to prove". If the three are closely related, a complete demonstration process can be formed.

Second, there are two basic ways of discussion: argument and refutation.

1. quarrel

Argumentation means that the purpose of argumentation is to prove one's argument from the front. When putting forward one's own views and opinions on a certain problem and expressing one's attitude, we should pay attention to three points: First, these views and opinions are truly unique and correct only after careful consideration or certain practice, or ideas that can actually solve practical problems. Let readers feel innovative, increase their knowledge and improve their understanding of things. Second, we should demonstrate around the issues discussed and the central arguments. What kind of questions are raised at the beginning, which comes down to this at the end of the article. In the process of argumentation, we should not deviate from Wan Li, give full play to it at will, or change the topic at will. If there are several sub-arguments, each sub-argument should be related to and subordinate to the central argument. All arguments should revolve around the central argument, so that readers can clearly understand the sub-argument and the central argument. Argumentative writing is very logical, and the argument must be close to the center and consistent from beginning to end. Third, "standing" is often carried out on the basis of "breaking". In the process of argumentation, it is often necessary to mention some wrong viewpoints and propositions, and deny and refute them in order to increase the effect of argumentation.

Step 2 refute

Refutation means that the purpose of argument is to refute a wrong argument or related arguments and arguments. There are three points to be paid attention to in refutation: First, "breaking" means something, and you can express your correct views and opinions by refuting other people's wrong remarks. Sometimes it is necessary to clearly put forward correct views and propositions in rebuttal, so that readers can easily distinguish right from wrong and better achieve the purpose of rebuttal. The second is to analyze and treat objections. It is impossible to speak alone. Every sentence is a fallacy. When refuting, you should affirm the correct point of view of the other party and only refute the part that is really wrong. We should have a serious attitude, not exaggerating each other's mistakes, seeking truth from facts and being reasonable. This detailed analysis is easy to convince. Third, when writing a rebuttal, it is especially necessary to convince people by reasoning, and it is most taboo to draw conclusions about the other party's views on the basis of lack of analysis and reasoning. Of course, you should stick to your own point of view, but you should not argue irrationally, leave room for your tone, and have a discussion attitude that is willing to listen to each other's opinions.

Generally speaking, argumentative writing contains little knowledge, but candidates should spend more time trying to figure out its details and use it flexibly, so that argumentative writing can be really improved.