Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What does the failure of paper analysis mean?
What does the failure of paper analysis mean?
The failure of paper analysis means that the paper duplicate checking system can't effectively analyze and detect papers and can't provide accurate duplicate checking results.

1. There are too many words in the paper: some words in the detection system are limited, and HowNet measures them one by one. Different detection systems limit the number of characters differently. If the characters in the paper exceed the limit of the selected inspection system, the inspection result will be affected.

2. Incomplete information and data: when the graduation thesis was submitted for monitoring, the title or author of the thesis was not submitted.

3. Document error: submit a paper document in the format specified by the system, such as Word or PDF version. The document submitted for data upload is too large. If there are no graduation design papers exceeding 30MB, the technical test fails.

4. Incorrect version selection. Online peer review system has corresponding versions for different types of papers, including VIP system for graduate papers and PMLC system for undergraduate papers. If you upload the graduate thesis to the VIP system by mistake, you will not take the exam and the failure will be over.

5. Neutral submission: The reason for neutral submission may be that the author uploads the data of the paper to be detected in an open state, which leads to the detection system being unable to parse the document.

6. Detection system factors: First, there are many users who repeatedly check, which leads to the failure of detection system analysis. The second is that the upgrade of HowNet system will also lead to the failure of analysis, but we will eventually issue the test and analysis results, which is only a matter of time management.

Paper type:

1. Thematic type: This is a kind of paper that expresses opinions in the form of direct discussion, and puts forward academic problems of a certain subject from the front on the basis of analyzing previous research results.

2. Argumentative: This is a paper that focuses on others' views on an academic issue of a certain discipline, with sufficient arguments, focusing on exposing its shortcomings or mistakes, and expressing opinions through argumentation.

3. Abstract: This is a kind of paper that introduces or comments on an academic issue of a certain subject on the basis of summarizing the existing research results of predecessors or present people to express their own opinions.

4. Synthesis: This is a paper written by organically combining summary and argumentation.