Doctoral students are overqualified as teachers.
First of all, education is not everything. Why do some people think that "graduates from top universities are overqualified to teach in primary and secondary schools"? There is no doubt that because they are "graduates from top universities", they are geniuses in the eyes of ordinary people, and they have higher talents, so they should make greater achievements instead of being trapped in a corner of the podium to teach. But in this way, those graduates who are not from top universities are not overqualified to teach?
As a freshman, my knowledge is not as profound as yours, but am I not as good as you? I teach and educate people "deservedly", but you are "overqualified" Yuan Longping's universities are South Agricultural College, which is not top-notch, but are they worse than those who graduated from top universities?
Long-term achievements cannot be completely determined by initial education. Obviously, blindly respecting the graduates of top universities and belittling the graduates of other schools is an academic discrimination and an ideological prejudice. In today's social environment that advocates equality, this concept of "education is the highest" should be reversed, so as to recruit students on the basis of merit, live within our means, and "not judge heroes by their education."
Secondly, teaching and educating people is not "overqualified". What is "overqualified"? Our country has respected teachers and valued morality since ancient times.
Traditionally, teachers are respected professions. As teachers, why are graduates from top universities "overqualified"? You may think that they should enter scientific research and other fields to make greater contributions to the country, rather than engage in the relatively ordinary occupation of teachers. According to some surveys, in recent years, graduates from top universities in China have been losing abroad, and many of them have gone abroad for further study and eventually emigrated.
Under such circumstances, isn't it a blessing that some top university graduates are willing to devote themselves to education and train more talents for the country? Moreover, if there is no education field to train talents for the scientific research field, I am afraid that the scientific research field will be difficult to progress and slowly decline. It can be seen that graduates from top universities are not overqualified to teach in primary and secondary schools. Teaching in primary and secondary schools is also a process of adaptation and accumulation for graduates from top universities.
Many people feel uncomfortable when they first enter the society, and so do the graduates of these top universities. Teaching in primary and secondary schools and returning to the familiar campus environment can not only alleviate their discomfort in entering the society, but also give them the opportunity to accumulate themselves after teaching. In this way, whether they continue to engage in the education industry or switch to other industries in the future, the accumulated experience during this period can help them go further and higher in their careers.
Graduates from top universities teaching in primary and secondary schools should not be labeled as "overqualified", but should be respected by people. Not only the graduates of these top universities who entered primary and secondary schools, but also all the teachers and scholars who devoted themselves to education ... they should be respected by us.
As the saying goes, "there is no high or low occupation", the scientists in the research room are not noble, and the roadside sanitation workers are not noble. As a teacher, teaching and educating people has its own merits, and respecting teachers means respecting knowledge. Only in this way can we get closer to realizing the great dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.