Judging whether it is plagiarized or not by the repetition rate of the duplicate checking results of the paper. If the duplicate checking rate is lower than the requirements, it is not plagiarism. For example, submitting journals require that the repetition rate of paper duplicate checking is below 20%, so the duplicate checking result cannot exceed 20%. In addition, if there are quoted paragraphs in the text, you must follow the correct quotation format specification. Otherwise it will be regarded as plagiarism.
Plagiarism not only continues to ferment in domestic public space, but also appears in major media in Belgium, causing widespread local controversy, and it is recognized that plagiarism is incredible. Because the works of the parties concerned are often photographed in many well-known auction houses in Europe, America, Hong Kong and other places, the incident immediately attracted the attention of the world after it was exposed.
That is to say, if we can't give a responsible explanation to all parties in time, so as to gain the effect of "the city gate is on fire, and the fish in the pool are affected", I'm afraid plagiarism will not only affect the copyright of the original author, the reputation of the plagiarist and the interests of collectors, but also may "punish the whole contemporary art in China".
Personally, the Belgian painter explicitly accused the people involved of plagiarizing his works created in the 1980s. Whether this is the case requires urgent communication between the two sides. It is imperative that the parties concerned stand up and respond: "Yes" means sincere apology and compensation in order to understand and reconcile; "No" is a powerful refutation of "washing your body" to set the record straight.
As far as the third party is concerned, it needs professional knowledge to issue a convincing authoritative conclusion to make it clear whether it is plagiarism. On the one hand, the parties are innocent, so as to avoid the two sides holding their own words, unable to convince anyone, and even triggering transnational litigation; Then give the public a clear idea to eliminate the continuous fermentation and negative impact of the incident.