Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How long does the sci decision-making process take?
How long does the sci decision-making process take?
Generally no more than one month.

When the submission status changes to "decision in process", it means that the editorial department of the journal is making a decision on your paper. At this stage, the editor will review the papers and comments before making a decision. If this status has not changed for more than one month, you can send an email to consult the editor.

Editorial invitation directly becomes the decision-making process.

Strangely, two weeks after the editor invited me for more than a month, the ongoing decision appeared directly. Under normal circumstances, the invited editor should be invited by the editorial department for editing after the first trial is passed. Why did you decide directly without editing? I want to ask about this process. Thank you.

The manuscript processing flow of each journal will be slightly different. It is possible that a periodical will appoint an editor as soon as it receives the contribution. While waiting for the editor's reply, the editor will conduct technical review of the manuscript to speed up the paper processing, which may be the reason why the state directly becomes the decision-making in progress.

However, without peer review, the paper becomes a decision in the process, which may mean direct rejection. In the process of technical review, editors may directly reject papers if they find that they do not conform to the scope of the journal, the rules for submitting journals, or lack of moral approval documents or disclosure statements. This situation is called desk rejection.

If this is the case, if you can fill in the missing documents or adjust the papers according to the regulations of the journal, you can still re-submit to the same journal.

The decision being processed appeared in two rounds of revision.

After two rounds of revision, the submitted documents are being processed. What does this mean? How long will this process take?

This time it is no different from the decision being made after the first review. The editor is evaluating the manuscript and making a final decision according to the opinions of the reviewers and the content of the paper. For papers in the revision stage, the editor may consult the reviewers again.

In addition, in recent years, the number of global contributions has increased dramatically, and editors may have multiple contributions to deal with at the same time and need to "queue up", resulting in a long-term stay in the state of decision-making. ?

There is no specific time frame at this stage; The time required will vary according to different journals and disciplines. In my opinion, if this state lasts for a month and you haven't received any reply, you can write to the editor and ask about the status of your paper.

The status date has changed.

During submission, the status "Decision in Progress" (Sep. 15) is displayed. But after three days, the status "Decision in Progress" is displayed (Sep. 18). May I ask what caused this change?

If only the date of the status has changed and the status itself has not changed, it means that the editing login system has checked your paper. At this stage, the editor will look at the comments received or the papers before making a decision. You should be informed of the result soon.