1, a review should consist of at least three parts: first, introduce the title, content and characteristics of the original article; The second is to analyze and evaluate the content and characteristics of the original work according to my own understanding, that is, to talk about the overall impression of the work as a whole; The third is the feeling and experience after reading. That is, the first part is the explanation, the second part is the evaluation of the work according to the evidence, and the third part is the feeling, with the emphasis on the word "feeling".

2. The first point is "reading". "Reading" is the basis of feeling, and "feeling" is born from "reading". Only by reading carefully, understanding the difficulties and doubts, combing the ideas of the article, thoroughly grasping the content and main points of the article, deeply understanding the spirit of the original text, and combining historical experience, current situation and personal reality, can we really have a "feeling". Therefore, to write a review, we must first understand the original.

3. Second, think carefully. The theme of reading is "feeling". Practically speaking, we should make our own analysis and evaluation on the basis of reading the original works. Analysis and evaluation are the process of emotional gestation, concentration and evolution. With this kind of analysis and evaluation, it is possible to closely link feelings with the main ideas and viewpoints of the original work, and avoid being divorced from the original work, rambling and being too far away from the center. Therefore, when writing your thoughts after reading, you must think while reading, combine historical experience, connect the current situation with your own reality, and connect yourself with what you see from people and things in the book. People who are similar and similar to the book, people who are opposite and opposite to the book, agree with you in the book and oppose you in the book, thus stimulating your feelings and making them organized, systematic and theoretical. In short, if you think deeply, you can write deeply and touching.

4. Third, we should grasp the key points. After reading an article (part), you will have a lot of feelings and experiences, but you can't write them all. The feeling after reading is the deepest feeling of writing, not the book review, which can't fully introduce and evaluate the works. Therefore, if we carefully choose meaningful and targeted feelings for real life, we can avoid the disadvantages of generalities, scattered articles, aimlessness and no connection with examples.

5. How can we grasp the key points? After reading a work or an article, we will naturally be moved and have many feelings, but many of these feelings are fragmentary, some are vague and disappear in an instant. If you want to write out your thoughts after reading, you must be good at grasping these fragmentary and even vague feelings, thinking and comparing them repeatedly, finding out two outstanding and realistic ones, then concentrating them and sorting them out on the basis of in-depth thinking. Only in this way can we grasp the problems with practical significance and write real and profound precious feelings for solving people's problems in study, thought and practice.

6. Fourth, it is true and natural. Is to write about your true feelings. Write how you are moved and how you think. The more concrete and real your thoughts are, the more sincere, vivid and inspiring your articles will be.

7. From the perspective of expression, the feelings after reading are often discussed by narration and lyricism when necessary. Narration is putting facts into practice. Discussion is about feelings and reasoning. Lyric is to express the feeling after reading. Narrative language should be concise, accurate and lyrical. The three should be integrated into one, avoiding empty talk, big talk and slogans.

8. There are two forms of expression: one is to explain the truth with practice. This is to use my own personal experience and concrete and vivid examples to clarify the correctness of a truth from the combination of theory and practice, to concretize and visualize the theory, and to make it vivid and rational. The second is to explain the significance from the perspective of research theory. According to your own research and understanding, clarify a difficult ideological point of view, or evaluate the ideological significance of a work. Its function is to help readers deepen their understanding of the original text theoretically. This kind of feeling after reading is mainly based on the word "feeling", but it is theoretical, so we must pay attention to the characteristics of argumentative writing, such as clear arguments, typical arguments, clear and prominent centers and so on.