1: Charlemagne unified Europe and began to implement the feudal fief system, marking the official appearance of the feudal hierarchy in Western Europe!

2. Quite simply, in China's ancient political system, the prime minister system was at the core, and it was the central link connecting all parts of the political system. To put it bluntly, the prime minister is the bond between the emperor and his subordinates and even the society-such a concept.

The British Parliament defeated the monarchy, which is the most typical. When you write your thesis, I suggest you start with the fact that the British Parliament defeated the feudal system. The history of the British Parliament is also the oldest, starting with the convening of the "Model Parliament" in 1259. It has a history of more than 700 years, and the struggle between kingship and parliamentary power is profound and complicated. Britain also had a long period of absolute monarchy. It is said that the struggle is profound and complicated because in those days, ordinary films recognized the royal power without understanding the parliamentary system. Under such a historical background, it is undoubtedly quite difficult to overthrow the royal power and establish a parliamentary system. The parliament, which represents the middle class (this middle class is completely different from today's middle class), has also waged a long-term struggle with the royal power. Parliament participates in politics through tax issues, impeaches powerful ministers and traitors, and cracks down on stupid kings and tyrants. Members often petition the king. For this reason, there are many kings who dissolved or even attacked Parliament in British history. When the parliament could not solve the contradiction between it and the royal power through peaceful means, the parliament organized an army, and the parliamentary army representing the middle class finally defeated the royal army representing the aristocratic class. In the 500-year-long struggle between parliament and kingship, parliament finally overthrew the kingship and established a relatively democratic republic, so that the king finally lost control and control of the country and became only a symbol of the country. If you want to write a paper, you need to pay attention to three important points: Parliament can defeat the kingship because it uses parliamentary finance (that is, I used tax issues to participate in politics) to erode the kingship, defeat the kingship by war, and overhead the kingship. You write from the above three points.

Before I tell you the difference between European feudalism and China feudalism. Since the Qin Dynasty, the feudal system in ancient China was a centralized system with imperial power as the core. The emperor owned the whole country's land and people, and formally led the world's princes, forming a set of national systems and systems, while the central power of the western feudal system was far less than that of Emperor China, and the king's control over the country was far less than that of Emperor China. Closer to the system in China during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period and the Wei and Jin Dynasties (after Wei and Jin Dynasties, the aristocratic class in China had already declined), Charlie enfeoffed the land of the country to the following nobles, and in return, these nobles had to provide the kingdom with troops to fight at any time, so the nobles enfeoffed the territory to the small nobles with troops, and the feudal system in Europe was formed-this is the reason. All this directly led to the emergence of a class with unique western characteristics between nobles and civilians. The king is the big Lord, followed by Hou Bozi, and big noble is the Lord of the small aristocracy. The little aristocrat is the master of the knight, and the knight is the master of the ordinary people. In fact, the kingdom under this system is very scattered. At that time, there was a popular saying in Europe-my Lord's Lord is no longer my Lord-to put it bluntly, knights may only be loyal to the viscount. The viscount was only loyal to the duke, so the kingship was largely overhead, and the fief undoubtedly became a country within a country. An aristocrat often meets for the sake of interest disputes, and the king often needs to please the aristocrats when fighting abroad-the central government has few troops, but the aristocrats are effectively loyal to their own troops.

It's hard to imagine that high school students nowadays will write such a paper!