1. Graduation design (thesis) is divided into excellent, good, medium and failed. The general proportion is excellent 10- 15%, good 30-35%, medium 30%, and the upper limit of passing and failing is 20%.

2. The grading standards at all levels can be measured from the following aspects:

(1) Completion of graduation project (thesis) task requirements;

(2) Among the major issues involved in graduation project (thesis), the degree to which students master the basic theories, knowledge and skills of this major;

(3) In the graduation project (thesis), the collection and arrangement of data, the experimental steps or investigation methods adopted;

(4) In the graduation project (thesis), cultivate students' ability of independent thinking, research and analysis, as well as the ability and degree of comprehensively applying what they have learned to solve practical problems;

(5) the topic of experiment or computer operation, the ability of hands-on operation, and the care for instruments, equipment, materials and tools;

(6) The graduation design (thesis) is fluent in writing, concise in narration, clear in organization, neat in handwriting, neat in drawing, correct in chart and complete in information.

The overall evaluation results of graduation design are evaluated according to four grades: excellent, good, passing and failing.

Excellent: above 90 points is excellent.

Scoring standard: the contents specified in the task book are successfully completed on schedule; Be able to skillfully and comprehensively apply the learned theories and professional knowledge; Correct demonstration, correct and rigorous calculation, analysis and experiment, reasonable conclusion, strong ability to work independently and good scientific style; Graduation design (thesis) has its own opinions and high level.

The graduation thesis is well-organized, fully discussed, fluent in words, neat in handwriting and complete, neat and correct in drawings.

Clear thinking, correct arguments, theoretical basis for answering questions, clear basic concepts, and in-depth and correct answers to major questions.

(2) Good: 70~89 is good.

Scoring standard: complete the tasks specified in the task book on schedule; Be able to use theory and professional knowledge well; Correct demonstration, correct and rigorous calculation, analysis and experiment, reasonable conclusion, and certain independent working ability and scientific style; Completed the task well.

Graduation thesis has a certain level.

When defending, the thinking is clear, the argument is basically correct, and the main questions can be answered very well.

(3) Pass: 60~69 is pass.

Scoring standard: complete the tasks specified in the task book on schedule; Using the learned theories and professional knowledge is basically correct; In principle, there are no major mistakes, only deficiencies and defects that are not the main content; The demonstration is correct, the calculation, analysis and experiment are basically correct, and I have the ability to work independently. Scientific style is average; The graduation thesis meets the basic requirements.

The graduation thesis is basically well organized, with individual mistakes (or unclear expression), scrawled handwriting, complete drawings and basically correct, but the quality is average or slightly defective.

The main questions in the defense can be answered or inspired. Basically correct, but the analysis and understanding are not deep enough.

(4) Failing: below 60 points is failing.

Scoring standard: failure to complete the tasks specified in the task book on schedule, failure to master basic concepts and skills, improper principled errors in the application of theory and professional knowledge, and poor ability to work independently in the whole scheme analysis and experimental work; The graduation thesis did not meet the minimum requirements.

The graduation thesis is unreasonable in arts and sciences, sloppy, poor in quality, incomplete in drawings, or wrong in principle.

The main content of the design (thesis) is unclear, the basic concepts are confused, and the main questions are answered incorrectly or cannot be answered.