First of all, you are right. I agree with you. Indeed, some teachers teach very well, but because the papers have not been published, they have never been evaluated. However, some teachers' teaching effect is not good, and they spend money to write a few papers, so they are evaluated.

If you teach well, you can evaluate your professional title, and you should also evaluate your professional title first. You really should. But how can we prove this?

Therefore, you should also think that publishing a paper is an effective way to sum up experience and improve visibility.

Without absolute fairness, no matter how perfect the evaluation system is, there will be loopholes, and there will always be people taking advantage of this loophole. We in China are good at this.

Suggestions are: write papers, publish them, and spend money if necessary.